One-stage robotically assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: analysis of 179 patients

被引:10
|
作者
Antanavicius, Gintaras [1 ]
Rezvani, Masoud [1 ]
Sucandy, Iswanto [1 ]
机构
[1] Abington Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Inst Bariatr & Metab Surg, Abington, PA 19001 USA
关键词
Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; Robotic-assisted; Morbid obesity; BARIATRIC SURGERY; LEARNING-CURVE; OBESE PATIENTS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2014.10.023
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) has been reported to be the most effective procedure for weight loss and minimizing postoperative weight regian. However, because of its technical complexity and concerns for higher operative and metabolic complications, it has not obtained widespread acceptance among patients or bariatric surgeons. Nevertheless, the use of robotic systems has been increasing because of its ability to overcome technical challenges, such as torque, freedom of movement, and precision. The objective of this study was to review the efficacy and safety of robotic assistance in laparoscopic BPD-DS. Methods: A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic BPD-DS between 2008 and 2013 Was, reviewed retrospectively. Results: A total of 179 consecutive patients (137 female and 42 male) were included in the study. The mean age was 44 years (20-72 yr). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 50.3 kg/m(2) (35-78.8 kg/m(2)), and the number of preoperative co-morbidities was 6.6 (2-14). Mean operative time for a typical BPD-DS with appendectomy was 249 minutes (162-413 min), which increased to 278 minutes (193-463 min) in adhesiolysis associated cases and increased to 272 minutes (186-431 min) if additional procedures, such as hiatal hernia repair, cholecystectomy, or Meckel's diverticulum resection, were included. All procedures were completed as a single-stage operation. There were no major intra-operative complications. Two patients had unexpected returns to the operating room during the same admission: one for an endoscopic release of an inadvertently sutured nasogastric tube and the other for port site infection. Median hospital stay was 2.7 days (1-13). Two patients had significantly longer stays for carpal tunnel syndrome exacerbation (9 d) and port site infection (13 d). Postoperatively, the median excess weight loss at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months with follow-up of 71% of patients at I year, 45% of patients at 2 years, and 15% of patients at 5 years, was 19%, 35.9%, 53.1%, 65.6%, 74.6%, 79.9%, and 75.8%, respectively. Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia went into remission 95.5%, 92.1%, and 92% of the time, respectively. No mortality occurred. Conclusions: Robotically assisted duodenoileal anastomosis during laparoscopic BPD-DS is a feasible, well-tolerated, and effective alternative to assist in the technically challenging part of the operation. (C) 2015 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 371
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch as treatment of high-risk super-obese patients: analysis of complications
    G. Silecchia
    M. Rizzello
    G. Casella
    M. Fioriti
    E. Soricelli
    N. Basso
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 1032 - 1037
  • [32] Second-Stage Robot-Assisted Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch After Sleeve Gastrectomy
    G. Fantola
    N. Reibel
    A. Germain
    A. Ayav
    L. Bresler
    L. Brunaud
    Obesity Surgery, 2015, 25 : 197 - 198
  • [33] Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: A comparative study
    Kim, WW
    Gagner, M
    Kini, S
    Inabnet, WB
    Quinn, T
    Herron, D
    Pomp, A
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (04) : 552 - 557
  • [34] Two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch as treatment of high-risk super-obese patients: analysis of complications
    Silecchia, G.
    Rizzello, M.
    Casella, G.
    Fioriti, M.
    Soricelli, E.
    Basso, N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (05): : 1032 - 1037
  • [35] Laparoscopic Reversal of the Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch: a Step by Step Video Case
    Halawani, Hamzeh M.
    Antanavicius, Gintaras
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (12) : 3327 - 3329
  • [36] Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: A comparative study
    Kim, WW
    Gagner, M
    Fukuyama, S
    Kini, S
    Quinn, T
    Herron, D
    Inabnet, B
    Pomp, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 122 (04) : A328 - A328
  • [37] Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: A comparative study
    Won-Woo Kim
    Michel Gagner
    Subhash Kini
    William B. Inabnet
    Terri Quinn
    Daniel Herron
    Alfons Pomp
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003, 7 : 552 - 557
  • [38] LAPAROSCOPIC BILIOPANCREATIC DIVERSION WITH DUODENAL SWITCH - STATUS OF A MALABSORPTIVE PROCEDURE IN A STEPWISE APPROACH
    Gaertner, Daniel
    Ernst, Alexander
    Fedtke, Katharina
    Schoettler, Axel
    Blueher, Matthias
    Schoen, Michael R.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 : S103 - S104
  • [39] One-stage conversion of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to a modified biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch using a hybrid sleeve concept
    Topart, Philippe
    Becouarn, Guillaume
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (09) : 1671 - 1678
  • [40] Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch for morbid obesity A feasibility study in pigs
    de Csepel, J
    Burpee, S
    Jossart, G
    Andrei, V
    Murakami, Y
    Benavides, S
    Gagner, M
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2001, 11 (02): : 79 - 83