Public funding for public goods: A post-Brexit perspective on principles for agricultural policy

被引:73
|
作者
Bateman, Ian J. [1 ]
Balmford, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] UEBS, Land Environm Econ & Policy Inst LEEP, Prince Wales Rd, Exeter EK4 4PJ, Devon, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Agriculture; Farming; Policy; Land use; Environment; Public goods; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; PARTICIPATION; BENEFITS; FARMERS; FOOD; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In early 2019 the United Kingdom is due to leave the European Union and with it the Common Agricultural Policy. The UK Government has announced its intentions to formulate a novel agricultural policy following the principle that public funding should be restricted to the provision of public goods. However, the acceptance, interpretation and application of this principle is the subject of intense debate. We overview the background to this debate, reveal the major flaws in present policy and identify and provide our answers to three key questions which future policy must address: (1) What are the farm related public goods that public money should support?; (2) How should that spending be allocated?; (3) How much should be spent? We believe that these questions and their answers will be of general interest beyond the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 300
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Funding Public Goods through Dedicated Taxes on Private Goods
    Chan, Nathan W.
    Kotchen, Matthew J.
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2022, 98 (03) : 428 - 439
  • [32] Potential impacts of post-Brexit agricultural policy on fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease in England: a modelling study
    Seferidi, Paraskevi
    Laverty, Anthony A.
    Collins, Brendan
    Bandosz, Piotr
    Capewell, Simon
    O'Flaherty, Martin
    Millett, Christopher
    Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan
    BMJ NUTRITION, PREVENTION & HEALTH, 2020, 3 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [33] Public Goods, NIH Funding, and Civic Literacy
    Twa, Michael D.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2017, 94 (05) : 543 - 544
  • [34] Post-Brexit regional policy in England: exploring 'Levelling Up' in practice
    Gray, Nick
    Broadhurst, Kate
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (12) : 2551 - 2562
  • [35] Funding public goods with lotteries: Experimental evidence
    Morgan, J
    Sefton, M
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2000, 67 (04): : 785 - 810
  • [36] Fortress Britain?: Ethical Approaches to Immigration Policy for a Post-Brexit Britain
    Harrison, Ted
    THEOLOGY, 2019, 122 (02) : 131 - 132
  • [37] A guide to Plan B: the UK’s vague strategy for post-Brexit science funding
    Holly Else
    Nature, 2022, 607 : 646 - 647
  • [38] The production of public goods by agricultural systems
    Salazar-Ordonez, Melania
    Rodriguez-Entrena, Macario
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ESTUDIOS AGROSOCIALES Y PESQUEROS-REEAP, 2018, (251): : 137 - 141
  • [39] A guide to Plan B: the UK's vague strategy for post-Brexit science funding
    Else, Holly
    NATURE, 2022, 607 (7920) : 646 - 647
  • [40] Post-exceptionalism in public policy: transforming food and agricultural policy
    Daugbjerg, Carsten
    Feindt, Peter H.
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 24 (11) : 1565 - 1584