Public funding for public goods: A post-Brexit perspective on principles for agricultural policy

被引:73
|
作者
Bateman, Ian J. [1 ]
Balmford, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] UEBS, Land Environm Econ & Policy Inst LEEP, Prince Wales Rd, Exeter EK4 4PJ, Devon, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Agriculture; Farming; Policy; Land use; Environment; Public goods; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; PARTICIPATION; BENEFITS; FARMERS; FOOD; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In early 2019 the United Kingdom is due to leave the European Union and with it the Common Agricultural Policy. The UK Government has announced its intentions to formulate a novel agricultural policy following the principle that public funding should be restricted to the provision of public goods. However, the acceptance, interpretation and application of this principle is the subject of intense debate. We overview the background to this debate, reveal the major flaws in present policy and identify and provide our answers to three key questions which future policy must address: (1) What are the farm related public goods that public money should support?; (2) How should that spending be allocated?; (3) How much should be spent? We believe that these questions and their answers will be of general interest beyond the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 300
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public money for public goods: The role of ideas in driving agriculture policy in the EU and post-Brexit UK
    Kam, Hermann
    Smith, Heather
    Potter, Clive
    LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 129
  • [2] Public health goals for a post-Brexit world
    Milne, Eugene
    Schrecker, Ted
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 39 (02) : 217 - 218
  • [3] Tax policy in the UK post-Brexit
    Freedman, Judith
    Loutzenhiser, Glen
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2022, 38 (01) : 188 - 204
  • [4] Policy implications for post-Brexit biotech
    Annaloro, John
    Mackey, Tim K.
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (08) : 710 - 711
  • [5] Policy implications for post-Brexit biotech
    John Annaloro
    Tim K Mackey
    Nature Biotechnology, 2017, 35 : 710 - 711
  • [6] Co-Design in Practice: Bringing STS to Post-Brexit Agricultural Policy
    Tsouvalis, Judith
    Burns, Charlotte
    Fajardo-Escoffie, Jose
    Rose, David Christian
    Hartley, Sue
    Little, Ruth
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2025,
  • [7] Impacts of post-Brexit agricultural policy on fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease
    Seferidi, P.
    Laverty, A. A.
    Pearson-Stuttard, J.
    Collins, B.
    Bandosz, P.
    Capewell, S.
    O'Flaherty, M.
    Millett, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [8] Post-Brexit English: A post-national perspective
    Saraceni, Mario
    WORLD ENGLISHES, 2017, 36 (03) : 350 - 352
  • [9] An ELF perspective on English in the post-Brexit EU
    Jenkins, Jennifer
    WORLD ENGLISHES, 2017, 36 (03) : 343 - 346
  • [10] UK trade and FDI: A post-Brexit perspective
    Dhingra, Swati
    Ottaviano, Gianmarco
    Rappoport, Veronica
    Sampson, Thomas
    Thomas, Catherine
    PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 97 (01) : 9 - 24