Effects of accommodations on high-stakes testing for students with reading disabilities

被引:50
|
作者
Fletcher, JM
Francis, DJ
Boudousquie, A
Copeland, K
Young, V
Kalinowski, S
Vaughn, S
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Ctr Acad Reading Skills, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Texas Inst Measurement Evaluat & Stat, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX 77004 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/001440290607200201
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The interaction hypothesis proposes that valid test accommodations benefit only those with disabilities. To evaluate this hypothesis, Grade 3 students with word decoding difficulties identified with dyslexia and average decoders were randomly assigned to take the same version Of the Texas reading accountability assessment under accommodated and standard administrations. The accommodated administration was given in 2 sessions with oral reading of proper nouns and comprehension stems. Only students with decoding problems benefited from the accommodations, showing a significant increase in average performance and a 7-fold increase in the odds of passing the test. These results supported the interaction hypothesis, showing that accommodations designed fined academic disability can enhance performance on a, high-stakes assessment. for a clearly defined academic disability can enhance performance on a, high-stakes assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 150
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-Stakes Collaborative Testing: Why Not?
    Levine, Ruth E.
    Borges, Nicole J.
    Roman, Brenda J. B.
    Carchedi, Lisa R.
    Townsend, Mark H.
    Cluver, Jeffrey S.
    Frank, Julia
    Morey, Oma
    Haidet, Paul
    Thompson, Britta M.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2018, 30 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [32] High-Stakes Testing !? Help Is on the Way
    Shultz, Cathleen M.
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 31 (04) : 205 - 205
  • [33] High-Stakes Testing Narrows the Curriculum
    David, Jane L.
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2011, 68 (06) : 78 - 80
  • [34] High-stakes testing and dropout rates
    Shribeg, David
    Burke Shriberg, Amy
    DISSENT, 2006, 53 (04) : 76 - 80
  • [35] This issue - The impact of high-stakes testing
    Clarke, M
    Gregory, K
    THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2003, 42 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [36] Native Americans and high-stakes testing
    Clark, JE
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2002, 83 (09) : 724 - 724
  • [37] Agora: The impact of high-stakes testing
    Middleton, R
    Thomas, A
    Ruiz, R
    McGuire, K
    Bellamy, GT
    Ohanian, S
    Bornfield, G
    O'Connell, PJ
    JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2000, 51 (04) : 289 - 292
  • [38] Assistencialism and the politics of high-stakes testing
    Urrieta Jr. L.
    The Urban Review, 2004, 36 (3) : 211 - 226
  • [39] The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing
    Basl, Josef
    SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 42 (05): : 1090 - 1093
  • [40] The Unintended Outcomes of High-Stakes Testing
    Jones, Brett
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 23 (02) : 65 - 86