Clinical Decision Support for Recognition and Management of Hypertension: A Randomized Trial

被引:46
|
作者
Kharbanda, Elyse O. [1 ]
Asche, Steve E. [1 ]
Sinaiko, Alan R. [3 ]
Ekstrom, Heidi L. [1 ]
Nordin, James D. [1 ]
Sherwood, Nancy E. [1 ,2 ]
Fontaine, Patricia L. [1 ]
Dehmer, Steven P. [1 ]
Appana, Deepika [1 ]
O'Connor, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] HealthPartners Inst, 8170 33rd Ave South,Mail Stop 23301A, Minneapolis, MN 55425 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pediat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BLOOD-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2017-2954
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Although blood pressure (BP) is routinely measured in outpatient visits, elevated BP and hypertension are often not recognized. We evaluated whether an electronic health record-linked clinical decision support (CDS) tool could improve the recognition and management of hypertension in adolescents. METHODS: We randomly assigned 20 primary care clinics within an integrated care system to CDS or usual care. At intervention sites, the CDS displayed BPs and percentiles, identified incident hypertension on the basis of current or previous BPs, and offered tailored order sets. The recognition of hypertension was identified by an automated review of diagnoses and problem lists and a manual review of clinical notes, antihypertensive medication prescriptions, and diagnostic testing. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test the effect of the intervention. RESULTS: Among 31 579 patients 10 to 17 years old with a clinic visit over a 2-year period, 522 (1.7%) had incident hypertension. Within 6 months of meeting criteria, providers recognized hypertension in 54.9% of patients in CDS clinics and 21.3% of patients in usual care (P <= .001). Clinical recognition was most often achieved through visit diagnoses or documentation in the clinical note. Within 6 months of developing incident hypertension, 17.1% of CDS subjects were referred to dieticians or weight loss or exercise programs, and 9.4% had additional hypertension workup versus 3.9% and 4.2%, respectively (P = .001 and .046, respectively). Only 1% of patients were prescribed an antihypertensive medication within 6 months of developing hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: The CDS had a significant, beneficial effect on the recognition of hypertension, with a moderate increase in guideline-adherent management.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Computerized Decision Support on Blood Pressure Management and Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    LeRoi S. Hicks
    Thomas D. Sequist
    John Z. Ayanian
    Shimon Shaykevich
    David G. Fairchild
    E. John Orav
    David W. Bates
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2008, 23 : 429 - 441
  • [32] EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF AN INTEGRATED COMPUTER-BASED DECISION SUPPORT WITH PERSON-CENTERED ANALYTICS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Liu, Xing
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E2 - E2
  • [33] Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring With Social Support for Patients With Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Teel, Joseph
    Reitz, Catherine R.
    Purcell, Alison
    Shen, Humphrey
    Mcnelis, Kiernan
    Snider, Christopher K.
    Asch, David A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (06)
  • [34] Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial
    Montgomery, AA
    Fahey, T
    Peters, TJ
    MacIntosh, C
    Sharp, DJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7236): : 686 - 690
  • [35] Decision Aids Can Support Cancer Clinical Trials Decisions: Results of a Randomized Trial
    Politi, Mary C.
    Kuzemchak, Marie D.
    Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
    Perkins, Hannah
    Liu, Jingxia
    Byrne, Margaret M.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (12): : 1461 - 1470
  • [36] Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
    Rush, William A.
    Johnson, Paul E.
    Amundson, Gerald H.
    Asche, Stephen E.
    Ekstrom, Heidi L.
    Gilmer, Todd P.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [37] Randomized Trial of Population-Based Clinical Decision Support to Facilitate Care Transitions
    Eisenstein, Eric L.
    Willis, Janese M.
    Edwards, Rex
    Anstrom, Kevin J.
    Kawamoto, Kensaku
    Del Fiol, Guilherme
    Johnson, Fred S.
    Lobach, David F.
    BUILDING CAPACITY FOR HEALTH INFORMATICS IN THE FUTURE, 2017, 234 : 98 - 103
  • [38] A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool for Inpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship
    Ridgway, Jessica P.
    Robicsek, Ari
    Shah, Nirav
    Smith, Becky A.
    Singh, Kamaljit
    Semel, Jeffery
    Acree, Mary Ellen
    Grant, Jennifer
    Ravichandran, Urmila
    Peterson, Lance R.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 72 (09) : E265 - E271
  • [39] Clinical Decision Support for Early Recognition of Sepsis
    Amland, Robert C.
    Hahn-Cover, Kristin E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2016, 31 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [40] Clinical Decision Support for Early Recognition of Sepsis*
    Amland, Robert C.
    Hahn-Cover, Kristin E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2019, 34 (05) : 494 - 501