An Analysis on Tools for Accessibility Evaluation in Mobile Applications

被引：5

作者：

Siebra, Clauirton A. ^{[1
]}

Correia, Walter ^{[2
]}

Penha, Marcelo ^{[2
]}

Macedo, Jefte ^{[3
]}

Quintino, Jonysberg ^{[3
]}

Anjos, Marcelo ^{[4
]}

Florentin, Fabiana ^{[4
]}

Silva, Fabio Q. B. ^{[5
]}

Santos, Andre L. M. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Informat Ctr, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Design Dept, CAC, Recife, PE, Brazil

[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Samsung Project, CIn, Recife, PE, Brazil

[4] Samsung, SIDI, Mobile Solut, Campinas, SP, Brazil

[5] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Informat, Recife, PE, Brazil

来源：

SBES'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE XXXII BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING | 2018年

关键词：

Accessibility; Requirements validation; Automation tools;

D O I：

10.1145/3266237.3266238

中图分类号：

TP31 [计算机软件];

学科分类号：

081202 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

This research aims at identifying if current code validation tools contemplate the requirements of a guideline for the development of accessible mobile applications, called GUAMA, which was specified by our team over 3 years of research with visually impaired individuals and whose final conception process is formalized in this paper. Then, several tools were analyzed and two of them were chosen for a deeper study: Lint and Espresso. The results showed that Lint and Espresso respectively contemplate 12 and 6 from the 48 GUAMA requirements. Thus, the unique use of such tools is not adequate to validate the range of requirements. These results have motivated the investigation of a new integrated service/process, which presents a higher coverage regarding the validation of accessibility requirements.

引用

页码：172 / 177

页数：6

共 50 条

[31] Examining standardized tools used for the evaluation of mobile health applications for cardiovascular disease
Kircher, Jennifer
Swoboda, Walter
Holl, Felix
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
[32] Animations in Cross-Platform Mobile Applications: An Evaluation of Tools, Metrics and Performance
Biorn-Hansen, Andreas
Gronli, Tor-Morten
Ghinea, Gheorghita
SENSORS, 2019, 19 (09)
[33] Accessibility Evaluation of a Mobile Biometric Recognition System
Blanco-Gonzalo, Ramon
Sanchez-Reillo, Raul
Sanchez-Redondo, Carlos
Luis Alonso-Aguilera, Jose
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IDENTITY, SECURITY AND BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS (ISBA), 2016,
[34] Accessibility evaluation of a mobile biometric recognition system
1600, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., United States
[35] Comparing Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and Evaluating the Accessibility of Webpages: Proposed Frameworks
Alsaeedi, Abdullah
INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (01)
[36] Accessibility in mobile applications for elderly users: a systematic mapping
de Oliveira, Camila Dias
Fioravanti, Maria Lydia
de Mattos Fortes, Renata Pontin
Barbosa, Ellen Francine
2018 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2018,
[37] Accessibility of mobile applications for tourism—is equal access a reality?
Stephane Madeira
Frederico Branco
Ramiro Gonçalves
Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira
Fernando Moreira
José Martins
Universal Access in the Information Society, 2021, 20 : 555 - 571
[38] Browser-Based Accessibility Evaluation Tools for Beginners
McHale, Nina
JOURNAL OF WEB LIBRARIANSHIP, 2011, 5 (04) : 334 - 343
[39] Comunicability of two Web 2.0 accessibility evaluation tools
Pascual, Afra
Ribera, Mireia
Granollers, Toni
2015 10TH COMPUTING COLOMBIAN CONFERENCE (10CCC), 2015, : 213 - 216
[40] Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness
Giorgio Brajnik
Universal Access in the Information Society, 2004, 3 (3-4) : 252 - 263

← 1 2 3 4 5 →