Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey

BackgroundThe use of measurement instruments in physiotherapy has been recommended in clinical practice guidelines to improve evidence-based practice. The aims of the study were (a) to describe the current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany and (b) to investigate the facilitators and barriers to use measurement instruments.MethodsThis cross-sectional study used a nationwide online survey, which was accessible to all physiotherapists working in Germany.ResultsIn total, 522 adult physiotherapists working in Germany completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 38years, 63% were female, and 53% had >10years of work experience.Thirty-one percent of the respondents used measurement instruments in 80% of their patients, and 26% used measurement instruments in 20%. Measurement instruments were used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes by 69% and 22% of respondents, respectively. The three most frequently reported measurement instruments were goniometer (n=254), some kind of a visual/numeric analogue scale (n=139), and the manual examination of muscle-strength (n=54). Seven of the 13 most stated measurement instruments measure activities or participation.The most important facilitator was physiotherapists' positive attitudes towards measurement instruments. Two out of three respondents reported having sufficient knowledge and skills to apply measurement instruments in clinical practice. The most pronounced barriers were insufficient additional financial compensations and requiring extra time to document test scores. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents could imagine using an electronic device for a user-friendly patient health record system in clinical practice.ConclusionsThe limited use of measurement instruments reported by physiotherapists working in Germany appears to be due to organisational issues, in combination with a lack of knowledge and skills needed to apply the measurement instruments, rather than due to individual or managerial reasons. To support the use of measurement instruments, sufficient time resources and adequate financial compensation are required. Educational approaches should focus on imparting patient-centred and patient-reported outcomes to quantify activities and participation. Electronic patient health record systems have potential to facilitate the application of standardised measurement instruments if the barriers identified in this survey are addressed properly.