Response of non-dicamba-resistant soybean (Glycine max) varieties to dicamba

被引:5
|
作者
Meyeres, Tyler [1 ]
Lancaster, Sarah [1 ]
Kumar, Vipan [2 ]
Roozeboom, Kraig [1 ]
Peterson, Dallas [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Agr Res Ctr, Dept Agron, Hays, KS USA
关键词
Off-target movement; injury; soybean varieties; yield components; offspring; HERBICIDES; GLYPHOSATE; INJURY; 2,4-D; EXPOSURE; RATES; DRIFT;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2021.4
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Introduction and rapid adoption of dicamba-resistant (DR) soybean led to an increase of post-emergent applications of dicamba. This resulted in a widespread increase in nontarget dicamba injury to non-DR soybean in 2017. Field studies were conducted in Manhattan, KS, in 2018 and 2019 and in Ottawa, KS, in 2019 to investigate the injury and yield response of soybean varieties with varying herbicide-resistance traits and maturity groups when exposed to dicamba. Four varieties were tested: 'Credenz 3841LL' (glufosinate resistant), 'Credenz 4748LL' (glufosinate resistant), 'Asgrow AG4135RR2Y' (glyphosate resistant), and 'Stine 40BA02' (glyphosate and isoxaflutole resistant), abbreviated as CR3841, CR4748, AG4135, and ST40B, respectively. Soybeans were treated with 5.6 g ae ha(-1) of dicamba at V3 and R1 stages. Percent soybean injury, soybean height, soybean yield and yield components, and injury to offspring were evaluated. Four weeks after treatment (WAT) at V3, the greatest injury was observed in AG4135 and ST4OB. Dicamba application at R1 resulted in the greatest injury to ST4OB both 4 WAT and at senescence. Minimal injury was observed in all varieties treated at V3 at senescence and yield loss was 5% or less. Dicamba application at R1 resulted in 19 to 34% yield loss, with the least yield loss in CR4748, and the greatest in ST4OB. Varieties with greater injury at senescence generally yielded less than other varieties.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 724
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Control of glyphosate-resistant waterhemp with preemergence herbicides in glyphosate- and dicamba-resistant soybean
    Hedges, Brittany K.
    Soltani, Nader
    Hooker, David C.
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 99 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [42] Effect of postemergence applications of aminocyclopyrachlor, aminopyralid, 2,4-D, and dicamba on non-auxin resistant soybean
    Mueller, Thomas C.
    Clark, Trey I.
    Vargas, Jose J.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (05) : 630 - 637
  • [43] Dicamba-Tolerant Soybeans (Glycine max L.) MON 87708 and MON 87708 x MON 89788 Are Compositionally Equivalent to Conventional Soybean
    Taylor, Mary
    Bickel, Anna
    Mannion, Rhonda
    Bell, Erin
    Harrigan, George G.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2017, 65 (36) : 8037 - 8045
  • [44] Economics of reducing Palmer amaranth seed production in dicamba/glufosinate/glyphosate-resistant soybean
    Striegel, Adam
    Jhala, Amit J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (04) : 2518 - 2540
  • [45] Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Control in Dicamba-Tolerant Soybean
    Vink, Joseph P.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Tardif, Francois J.
    Lawton, Mark B.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (03) : 422 - 428
  • [46] Characterization of soybean (Glycine max) varieties as per DUS guidelines
    Ramteke, Rajkumar
    Murlidharan, Pooja
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2012, 82 (07): : 572 - 577
  • [47] Soybean (Glycine max) response to phosphate deficiency
    Fragoso, S
    Martínez-Barajas, E
    Vázquez-Santana, S
    Acosta, J
    Coello, P
    AGROCIENCIA, 2005, 39 (03) : 303 - 310
  • [48] Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate
    Krausz, RE
    Young, BG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) : 745 - 749
  • [49] Cotton, Peanut, and Soybean Response to Sublethal Rates of Dicamba, Glufosinate, and 2,4-D
    Johnson, Virginia A.
    Fisher, Loren R.
    Jordan, David L.
    Edmisten, Keith E.
    Stewart, Alexander M.
    York, Alan C.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 195 - 206
  • [50] Response of soybean, cotton, and tobacco to volatility of 2,4-D and dicamba formulations in humidome
    Polli, Estefania G.
    Gannon, Travis W.
    LeCompte, Mathieu
    Rogers, Ronald R.
    Beran, Daniel D.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 38