Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys

被引:17
|
作者
Cantuaria, Manuella Lech [1 ]
Blanes-Vidal, Victoria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Maersk Mc Kinney Moller Inst, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
Survey mode; Data collection; Survey design; Questionnaire; Mixed-mode surveys; Rural residents; Mail survey; Web survey; RURAL-URBAN DIFFERENCES; RESPONSE RATES; AIR-POLLUTION; PAPER SURVEYS; DATA QUALITY; MODE; PARTICIPATION; RESIDENTS; TELEPHONE; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-019-0882-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Internet has been broadly employed as a facilitator for epidemiological surveys, as a way to provide a more economical and practical alternative to traditional survey modes. A current trend in survey research is to combine Web-based surveys with other survey modes by offering the participant the possibility of choosing his/her preferred response method (i.e. mixed-mode approach). However, studies have also demonstrated that the use of different survey modes may produce different responses to the same questions, posing potential challenges on the use of mixed-mode approaches. Methods In this paper, we have implemented a statistical comparison between mixed-mode survey responses collected via mail (i.e. paper) and Web methods obtained from a cross-sectional study in non-urban areas of Denmark. Responses provided by mail and Web participants were compared in terms of: 1) the impact of reminder letters in increasing response rates; 2) differences in socio-demographic characteristics between response groups; 3) changes on the likelihood of reporting health symptoms and negative attitudes towards environmental stressors. Comparisons were mainly performed by two sample t-test, Pearson's Chi-squared test and multinomial logistic regression models. Results Among 3104 contacted households, 1066 residents decided to participate on the study. Out of those, 971 selected to respond via mail, whereas 275 preferred the Web method. The majority of socio-demographic characteristics between these two groups of respondents were shown to be statistically different. The use of mailed surveys increased the likelihood of reporting health symptoms and negative attitudes towards environmental stressors, even after controlling for demographic characteristics. Furthermore, the use of reminder letters had a higher positive impact in increasing responses of Web surveys when compared to mail surveys. Conclusions Our main findings suggest that the use of mail and Web surveys may produce different responses to the same questions posed to participants, but, at the same time, may reach different groups of respondents, given that the overall characteristics of both groups considerably differ. Therefore, the tradeoff between using mixed-mode survey as a way to increase response rate and obtaining undesirable measurement changes may be attentively considered in future survey studies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Web-based vs. controlled environment psychophysics experiments
    Zuffi, Silvia
    Scala, Paolo
    Brambilla, Carla
    Beretta, Giordano
    IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IV, 2007, 6494
  • [32] Validation of Web-based self-reported socio-demographic and anthropometric data collected in the Food4Me Study
    Celis-Morales, C.
    Forster, H.
    O'Donovan, C.
    Woolhead, C.
    Marsaux, C.
    Fallaize, R.
    Macready, A. L.
    Kolossa, S.
    Navas-Carretero, S.
    San-Cristobal, R.
    Tsirigoti, L.
    Lambrinou, C. P.
    Godlewska, M.
    Surwillo, A.
    Gibney, E.
    Brennan, L.
    Walsh, M.
    Drevon, C.
    Manios, Y.
    Traczyk, I.
    Martinez, J. A.
    Lovegrove, J. A.
    Saris, W.
    Daniel, H.
    Gibney, M.
    Mathers, J. C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2014, 73 (OCE2) : E78 - E78
  • [33] Under-estimation of obesity, hypertension and high cholesterol by self-reported data: comparison of self-reported information and objective measures from health examination surveys
    Tolonen, Hanna
    Koponen, Paivikki
    Mindell, Jennifer S.
    Mannisto, Satu
    Giampaoli, Simona
    Dias, Carlos Matias
    Tuovinen, Tarja
    Goesswald, Antje
    Kuulasmaa, Kari
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 24 (06): : 941 - 948
  • [34] Push vs. pull in Web-based network management
    Martin-Flatin, JP
    INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT VI: DISTRIBUTED MANAGEMENT FOR THE NETWORKED MILLENNIUM, 1999, : 3 - 18
  • [35] Comparing Approaches to Collecting Self-Reported Data on HIV Status in Population-Based Surveys
    Brumfield, Sarah
    Dube, Albert
    Reniers, Georges
    Helleringer, Stephane
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2020, 85 (03) : E55 - E57
  • [36] Self-reported vs. objectively assessed adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma
    Jensen, Frodi
    Haakansson, Kjell Ej
    Nielsen, Britt Overgaard
    Weinreich, Ulla Moller
    Ulrik, Charlotte Suppli
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [37] Self-reported opportunistic screening mammography in Austria - 2005 vs. 1995
    Vutuc, Christian
    Waldhoer, Thomas
    Sevelda, Paul
    Micksche, Michael
    Haidinger, Gerald
    BREAST CARE, 2007, 2 (05) : 313 - 316
  • [38] It's Official: Predictors of Self-Reported vs. Officially Recorded Arrests
    Pollock, Wendi
    Menard, Scott
    Elliott, Delbert S.
    Huizinga, David H.
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2015, 43 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [39] Assessing the accuracy of self-reported health expenditure data: Evidence from two public surveys in China
    Hao, Zhuang
    Zhang, Xudong
    Wang, Yuze
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2024, 356
  • [40] Self-Reported vs. Measured Height, Weight, and BMI in Young Adults
    Olfert, Melissa D.
    Barr, Makenzie L.
    Charlier, Camille M.
    Famodu, Oluremi A.
    Zhou, Wenjun
    Mathews, Anne E.
    Byrd-Bredbenner, Carol
    Colby, Sarah E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10)