Quantitative evaluation of the influence of coal particle size distribution on gas diffusion coefficient by image processing method

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Jingjing [1 ]
Cheng, Deqiang [1 ]
Li, Yunlong [1 ]
Zhao, Kai [1 ]
Kou, Qiqi [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Informat & Control Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Image processing; Particle size distribution; Diffusion coefficient; Laser particle analyzer; Coal particles; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122946
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Coal particles have been widely used to measure the gas diffusion coefficient which is a key parameter to characterize the gas diffusion behavior, and the average particle size is a necessary parameter for calculating the diffusion coefficient. At present, people often use the arithmetic mean of upper and lower sieve surface specifications to characterize the average diameter of coal particles, which has large errors. It is necessary to obtain the particle size distribution in advance to determine the average diameter scientifically and accurately. A laser particle analyzer is usually used to measure particle size distribution, but due to the limitation of its measurement principle, it has poor measurement accuracy for irregular and large particles. In this article, we offer an integrated approach for quantitative evaluation of the influence of coal particle size distribution on gas diffusion coefficient. Laser particle analyzer and image analysis were used to measure the particle size distribution of 6 coal samples with the size range of 1 similar to 2 mm. Based on obtaining the size distribution, the average diameter was calculated. Then the diffusion coefficient was calculated by using the average diameter obtained by different methods. The results show that the particle size distribution measured by the laser method has a large deviation and poor repeatability, and the volume mean diameter calculated by it is far less than the arithmetic mean value of 1.5 mm. The imaging method can extract the morphological data of each particle, and so the obtained particle size distribution is more accurate and reliable. The equivalent area mean diameter calculated by the image method is close to 1.5 mm. The average diameter obtained by considering the particle size distribution can more truly reflect the particle size characteristics of coal samples, while the conventional method of using the arithmetic mean to calculate the diffusion coefficient will produce a non-negligible deviation. This also reveals the importance of obtaining particle size distribution when using the particle method to solve the diffusion coefficient.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of particle size and adsorption pressure on methane gas desorption and diffusion in coal
    Li, Xiangchun
    Li, Zhongbei
    Ren, Ting
    Nie, Baisheng
    Xie, Lei
    Huang, Tao
    Bai, Sheng
    Jiang, Ying
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 12 (24)
  • [22] Effects of particle size and adsorption pressure on methane gas desorption and diffusion in coal
    Xiangchun Li
    Zhongbei Li
    Ting Ren
    Baisheng Nie
    Lei Xie
    Tao Huang
    Sheng Bai
    Ying Jiang
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12
  • [23] ON DETERMINATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN POLYDISPERSE AEROSOLS BY DIFFUSION METHOD
    FUCHS, NA
    STAROSSELSKII, VI
    STECHKINA, IB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1962, 13 (06): : 280 - +
  • [24] Influence of concentration and particle size distribution on viscosity prediction of coal slurry
    Liu, Meng
    Chen, Liang-Yong
    Duan, Yu-Feng
    Ranliao Huaxue Xuebao/Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2009, 37 (03): : 266 - 270
  • [25] A Novel image processing technique for weighted particle size distribution assessment
    Latreille, Pierre-Luc
    Pazhayattil, Ajay Babu
    Turner, Sam
    Talwar, Naresh
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2024, 50 (06) : 550 - 560
  • [26] Particle size distribution analysis of mudstone based on digital image processing
    Liang, Ke
    Ran, Bo
    Liu, Shugen
    Sun, Tong
    Zhu, Yiqing
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2022, 10 (04): : B37 - B45
  • [27] Development of a particle size distribution analysis system by digital image processing
    Bozdag, T.
    Karpuz, C.
    International journal of surface mining & reclamation, 1997, 11 (02): : 59 - 67
  • [28] Image Analysis Techniques on Evaluation of Particle Size Distribution of Gravel
    Kumara, G. H. A. Janaka J.
    Hayano, Kimitoshi
    Ogiwara, Keita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2012, 3 (05): : 290 - 297
  • [29] Quantitative Evaluation of the Uniformity of Abrasive Distribution Based on Image Processing
    Pan, Bingsuo
    Wan, Biao
    Fang, Xiaohong
    SURFACE FINISHING TECHNOLOGY AND SURFACE ENGINEERING II, 2010, 135 : 314 - +
  • [30] Particle overlapping error correction for coal size distribution estimation by image analysis
    Zhang, Zelin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2016, 155 : 136 - 139