Good practices and deficiencies in conceptual modelling: A systematic literature review

被引:8
|
作者
Gabriel, Gustavo Teodoro [1 ]
Campos, Afonso Teberga [1 ]
Leal, Fabiano [1 ]
Montevechi, Jose Arnaldo Barra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Itajuba, Itajuba, Brazil
关键词
Conceptual modelling; simulation; systematic literature review; DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION; DECISION-SUPPORT; PRODUCTION LINE; DYNAMICS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1080/17477778.2020.1764875
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Conceptual modelling is a continuous and iterative process that is essential for simulation projects. However, it often does not receive due consideration. In this sense, many projects document and/or perform the conceptual modelling without following good practices, which ends up affecting the next stages of the simulation. This work aims to identify the state of the art and patterns of conceptual modelling through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), especially regarding the articles' adherence to good practices. We identified 13 good practices for conceptual modelling in the literature, which aims to develop effective conceptual models, i.e., models with suitable syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic quality. The results of the SLR indicate that although some good practices are consolidated, others need more attention, especially regarding semantic, pragmatic and report quality. Finally, we establish future directions to guide and improve projects that use conceptual modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 100
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Personality traits of a good liar: A systematic review of the literature
    Semrad, Monica
    Scott-Parker, Bridie
    Nagel, Michael
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 147 : 306 - 316
  • [22] DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA FOR USE IN ECONOMIC MODELLING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TO IDENTIFY THE EVIDENCE BASE
    Gonzalez-McQuire, S.
    Campioni, M.
    Bennison, C.
    Xu, W.
    Pantiri, K.
    Hensen, M.
    Weisel, K.
    Terpos, E.
    Knop, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A701 - A701
  • [23] Good modelling software practices
    Lemmen, Carsten
    Sommer, Philipp Sebastian
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2024, 498
  • [24] Approaches to Qualitative Comparative Analysis and good practices: A systematic review
    Thomann, Eva
    Ege, Joern
    Paustyan, Ekaterina
    SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 28 (03) : 557 - 580
  • [25] Assumptions of good practices in home care for the elderly: a systematic review
    Partezani Rodrigues, Rosalina Aparecida
    Bueno, Alexandre de Assis
    Casemiro, Francine Golghetto
    da Cunha, Alan Nogueira
    Nogueira de Carvalho, Lucas Pelegrini
    Almeida, Vanessa Costa
    dos Reis, Nayara Araujo
    Seredynskyj, Fernanda Laporti
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2019, 72 : 302 - 310
  • [26] Therapeutic writing practices with adolescents: A systematic literature review
    Boulay, Corentin
    Demogeot, Nadine
    Lighezzolo-Alnot, Joelle
    EVOLUTION PSYCHIATRIQUE, 2020, 85 (02): : 281 - 297
  • [27] IoT Best Practices and their components: A Systematic Literature Review
    Medina O, C. M.
    Blandon A, J. C.
    Zapata J, C. M.
    Rios P, J., I
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2022, 20 (10) : 2217 - 2228
  • [28] Responsible Innovation in SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review for a Conceptual Model
    Gonzales-Gemio, Carla
    Cruz-Cazares, Claudio
    Parmentier, Mary Jane
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 27
  • [29] The Safe City: Conceptual Model Development - A Systematic Literature Review
    Risdiana, Devi Mega
    Susanto, Tony Dwi
    FIFTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2019, 161 : 291 - 299
  • [30] Corporate sustainability assessments: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework
    Pranugrahaning, Agnes
    Donovan, Jerome D.
    Topple, Cheree
    Masli, Eryadi K.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 295 (295)