Status, legitimacy, and the presence of outside directors in China

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Jiawen [1 ]
Wu, Han [1 ]
Yao, Xiaotao [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion; Emerging economies; Political legitimacy; Social status; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INSTITUTIONAL ISOMORPHISM; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; DIFFUSION; MARKET; ORGANIZATIONS; COMPETITION; CONNECTIONS; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1108/MD-11-2015-0522
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine firms' early adoption decision regarding new practices, and what social factors - that is social status and political legitimacy - may influence decision processes under ambiguity. Design/methodology/approach - The study examines outside director presence among publicly listed firms in China between 1991 and 2000, using discrete time - event history analysis based on observation of 770 firms. Findings - Social status negatively influences early adoption decisions through the expectation of status enhancement, while political legitimacy is also influential because early adoptions are more attractive to firms in need of political access. Moreover, a firm political legitimacy moderates the effect of social status, due to their resource dependence on different stakeholders. Originality/value - This study's findings provide important insights for research on diffusion models of new practices by identifying the social processes during early diffusion, and articulating different effects of status and legitimacy. It further emphasizes the sociopolitical perspectives and social motives of governance structure changes in emerging economies.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1221
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The influence of the board of directors on outside-in strategy
    Whitler, Kimberly A.
    Puto, Christopher P.
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 90 : 143 - 154
  • [42] Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance
    Kim, Kyonghee
    Mauldin, Elaine
    Patro, Sukesh
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2014, 57 (2-3): : 110 - 131
  • [43] CEO age and outside directors: A hazard analysis
    Geddes, RR
    Vinod, HD
    REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1997, 12 (5-6) : 767 - 780
  • [44] Governance mandates, outside directors, and acquirer performance
    Dahya, Jay
    Golubov, Andrey
    Petmezas, Dimitris
    Travlos, Nickolaos G.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2019, 59 : 218 - 238
  • [45] Outside Directors on Korean Boards: Governance and Institutions
    Chizema, Amon
    Kim, Jootae
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, 47 (01) : 109 - 129
  • [46] Outside directors with a stake: The linchpin in improving governance
    Hambrick, DC
    Jackson, EM
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 42 (04) : 108 - +
  • [47] The Legitimacy of Democracy and the Politics of Presence
    Aquino de Souza, Cristiane
    DOXA-CUADERNOS DE FILOSOFIA Y DERECHO, 2010, 33 : 191 - 214
  • [48] Disciplinary directors: Evidence from the appointments of outside directors who have fired CEOs
    Cai, Jay
    Tu Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 96 : 221 - 235
  • [49] Legitimacy profiles of women directors on top French company boards
    Singh, Val
    Point, Sebastien
    Moulin, Yves
    Davila, Andres
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 34 (07) : 803 - 820
  • [50] Directors' Duties in China
    Xu, Guangdong
    Zhou, Tianshu
    Zeng, Bin
    Shi, Jin
    EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW, 2013, 14 (01) : 57 - 95