Considerations in the Selection of Global Climate Models for Regional Climate Projections: The Arctic as a Case Study

被引:89
|
作者
Overland, James E. [1 ]
Wang, Muyin [2 ]
Bond, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Walsh, John E. [3 ]
Kattsov, Vladimir M. [4 ]
Chapman, William L. [5 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, PMEL, Seattle, WA 98185 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Joint Inst Study Atmosphere & Ocean, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK USA
[4] Voeikov Main Geophys Observ, St Petersburg, Russia
[5] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
SIMULATIONS; ENSEMBLE; BUDGET;
D O I
10.1175/2010JCLI3462.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate projections at regional scales are in increased demand from management agencies and other stake-holders. While global atmosphere ocean climate models provide credible quantitative estimates of future climate at continental scales and above, individual model performance varies for different regions, variables, and evaluation metrics-a less than satisfying situation. Using the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere as a focus, the authors assess strategies for providing regional projections based on global climate models. Starting with a set of model results obtained from an "ensemble of opportunity," the core of this procedure is to retain a subset of models through comparisons of model simulations with observations at both continental and regional scales. The exercise is more one of model culling than model selection. The continental-scale evaluation is a check on the large-scale climate physics of the models, and the regional-scale evaluation emphasizes variables of ecological or societal relevance. An additional consideration is given to the comprehensiveness of processes included in the models. In many but not all applications, different results are obtained from a reduced set of models compared to relying on the simple mean of all available models. For example, in the Arctic the top-performing models tend to be more sensitive to greenhouse forcing than the poorer-performing models. Because of the mostly unexplained inconsistencies in model performance under different selection criteria, simple and transparent evaluation methods are favored. The use of a single model is not recommended. For some applications, no model may be able to provide a suitable regional projection. The use of model evaluation strategies, as opposed to relying on simple averages of ensembles of opportunity, should be part of future synthesis activities such as the upcoming Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1597
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancing reliability in climate projections: A novel approach for selecting global climate models
    Tanimu, Bashir
    Bello, Al-Amin Danladi
    Abdullahi, Sule Argungu
    Ajibike, Morufu A.
    bin Muhammad, Mohd Khairul Idlan
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2024, 134
  • [22] Assessment of Future Climate Change Projections Using Multiple Global Climate Models
    Oo, Han Thi
    Zin, Win Win
    Kyi, Cho Cho Thin
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2019, 5 (10): : 2152 - 2166
  • [23] Projections of Global Drought and Their Climate Drivers Using CMIP6 Global Climate Models
    Xu, Feng
    Bento, Virgilio A.
    Qu, Yanping
    Wang, Qianfeng
    WATER, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [24] Uncertainties in climate change projections, from the global to the regional scale
    Giorgi, F.
    ERCA 9: FROM THE GLOBAL MERCURY CYCLE TO THE DISCOVERIES OF KUIPER BELT OBJECTS, 2010, 9 : 115 - 129
  • [26] Future projections of cyclone activity in the Arctic for the 21st century from regional climate models (Arctic-CORDEX)
    Akperov, Mirseid
    Rinke, Annette
    Mokhov, Igor I.
    Semenov, Vladimir A.
    Parfenova, Mariya R.
    Matthes, Heidrun
    Adakudlu, Muralidhar
    Boberg, Fredrik
    Christensen, Jens H.
    Dembitskaya, Mariya A.
    Dethloff, Klaus
    Fettweis, Xavier
    Gutjahr, Oliver
    Heinemann, Gunther
    Koenigk, Torben
    Koldunov, Nikolay, V
    Laprise, Rene
    Mottram, Ruth
    Nikiema, Oumarou
    Sein, Dmitry
    Sobolowski, Stefan
    Winger, Katja
    Zhang, Wenxin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2019, 182
  • [27] A Comparison of Regional Climate Projections With a Range of Climate Sensitivities
    Barnes, Clair R.
    Chandler, Richard E.
    Brierley, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2024, 129 (02)
  • [28] Applying probabilistic projections of climate change with impact models: a case study for sub-arctic palsa mires in Fennoscandia
    Fronzek, Stefan
    Carter, Timothy R.
    Raisanen, Jouni
    Ruokolainen, Leena
    Luoto, Miska
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 99 (3-4) : 515 - 534
  • [29] Applying probabilistic projections of climate change with impact models: a case study for sub-arctic palsa mires in Fennoscandia
    Stefan Fronzek
    Timothy R. Carter
    Jouni Räisänen
    Leena Ruokolainen
    Miska Luoto
    Climatic Change, 2010, 99 : 515 - 534
  • [30] Cyclone Activity in the Arctic From an Ensemble of Regional Climate Models (Arctic CORDEX)
    Akperov, Mirseid
    Rinke, Annette
    Mokhov, Igor I.
    Matthes, Heidrun
    Semenov, Vladimir A.
    Adakudlu, Muralidhar
    Cassano, John
    Christensen, Jens H.
    Dembitskaya, Mariya A.
    Dethloff, Klaus
    Fettweis, Xavier
    Glisan, Justin
    Gutjahr, Oliver
    Heinemann, Guenther
    Koenigk, Torben
    Koldunov, Nikolay V.
    Laprise, Rene
    Mottram, Ruth
    Nikiema, Oumarou
    Scinocca, John F.
    Sein, Dmitry
    Sobolowski, Stefan
    Winger, Katja
    Zhang, Wenxin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2018, 123 (05) : 2537 - 2554