Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: An ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources

被引:71
|
作者
Makkonen, Marika [1 ,2 ]
Huttunen, Suvi [1 ]
Primmer, Eeva [1 ]
Repo, Anna [1 ]
Hilden, Mikael [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] Finnish Forest Res Inst Metla, Vantaa 01301, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Climate change mitigation; Forest; Carbon sequestration; Bioenergy; Policy coherence; DEPENDENT VARIABLE PROBLEM; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; CHANGE ADAPTATION; DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; SEQUESTRATION; INTEGRATION; CHALLENGE; SCALES;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Policies governing forest ecosystems can mitigate climate change in many ways, making use of various ecosystem services. Although identification of ecosystem service trade-offs has received increasing analytical attention, the policies and mixes of policies generating the trade-offs have remained outside the focus. To advance the policy relevance of ecosystem service trade-off analysis, we analyse the coherence of Finnish policies affecting forest bioenergy and carbon sequestration, two contrasting means to use forests for climate change mitigation. In particular, we focus on the interactions that different policy outputs have with respect to these two ecosystem services. The analysed policy outputs represent different foci and levels and rely on different mechanisms. We identify the direct and indirect impacts that the policy outputs have on the supply and demand of the services by utilizing natural science and policy assessment approaches. We find forest bioenergy, representing a tangible ecosystem service exchanged in the market, to be governed more positively and with more explicit instruments compared to carbon sequestration. Carbon sequestration policies remain at a higher level of abstraction, stating merely strategic objectives, possibly because these markets are only emerging and remain political and highly uncertain. Our analysis shows that trade-offs between the two ecosystem services are generated by policies supporting bioenergy, whilst general policies advance both services. The entire mix of policy outputs and its differentiated impacts on ecosystem services should be thoroughly considered when assessing the strategies for mitigating climate change and designing new policy instruments. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Role of Deadwood in Forests between Climate Change Mitigation, Biodiversity Conservation, and Bioenergy Production: A Comparative Analysis Using a Bottom-Up Approach
    De Meo, Isabella
    Sefidi, Kiomars
    Bayraktar, Selim
    Sergiacomi, Carlotta
    Paletto, Alessandro
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (20)
  • [32] Review on Conservation Approach Study of Largest Mangrove Ecosystem as the Mitigation of Climate Change
    Barua, Prabal
    Chowdhury, Sadika Sultana
    Mitra, Abhijit
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 10 (03) : 31 - 42
  • [33] Bridging mapping and simulation modelling in the ecosystem service assessments of boreal forests: effects of bioenergy production on carbon dynamics
    Anu Akuj?rvi
    Anna Repo
    Altti M.Akuj?rvi
    Jari Liski
    Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8 (01) : 35 - 49
  • [34] The Contribution of Trees Outside of Forests to Landscape Carbon and Climate Change Mitigation in West Africa
    Skole, David L.
    Samek, Jay H.
    Dieng, Moussa
    Mbow, Cheikh
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (12):
  • [35] Bridging mapping and simulation modelling in the ecosystem service assessments of boreal forests: effects of bioenergy production on carbon dynamics
    Akujarvi, Anu
    Repo, Anna
    Akujarvi, Altti M.
    Liski, Jari
    FOREST ECOSYSTEMS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [36] Bioenergy crop productivity and potential climate change mitigation from marginal lands in the United States: An ecosystem modeling perspective
    Qin, Zhangcai
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    Cai, Ximing
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (06): : 1211 - 1221
  • [37] Untangling the confusion around land carbon science and climate change mitigation policy
    Mackey, Brendan
    Prentice, I. Colin
    Steffen, Will
    House, Joanna I.
    Lindenmayer, David
    Keith, Heather
    Berry, Sandra
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (06) : 552 - 557
  • [38] Untangling the confusion around land carbon science and climate change mitigation policy
    Mackey B.
    Prentice I.C.
    Steffen W.
    House J.I.
    Lindenmayer D.
    Keith H.
    Berry S.
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 (6) : 552 - 557
  • [39] What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion
    Kammerer, Marlene
    Namhata, Chandreyee
    POLICY SCIENCES, 2018, 51 (04) : 477 - 513
  • [40] What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion
    Marlene Kammerer
    Chandreyee Namhata
    Policy Sciences, 2018, 51 : 477 - 513