Tips and tricks in the management of inflatable penile prosthesis infection: A review

被引:2
|
作者
Brimley, Scott C. [1 ]
Yousif, Ayad [1 ]
Kim, Joseph [1 ]
Hellstrom, Wayne J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Urol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
Prosthesis; implant; infection; salvage; erectile function; risk factors; SALVAGE PROCEDURE; EAU GUIDELINES; REPLACEMENT; PREVENTION; SURGERY; RISK; EXPERIENCE; PATTERNS; IMPLANTS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1080/2090598X.2021.1946335
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the management of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infection. Methods: The 'gold-standard' treatment for medication-refractory erectile dysfunction is the IPP, wherein the most dreaded complication is infection. To prevent and manage an infected IPP requires a strict protocol during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative course. A variety of techniques and antibiotics are used in conjunction with IPP implantation to prevent contamination. This modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) review of the literature examines the current practices by leading urologists in the management of IPP infection, as well as provides insights for improved patient outcomes. Results: Patient selection is important to reduce IPP infections, and those with risk factors need to be optimised prior to surgery. Proper antibiotic prophylaxis includes pre-, intra-, and postoperative administration. As most infections derive from normal skin flora, every measure must be taken to sterilise the skin and avoid direct device skin contact. Up to 3% of virgin IPPs develop infections and this number increases to 18% in revision cases. Antibiotic coverage depends on the presenting microbe, which can vary significantly between patients. Conclusions: A greater success in IPP implantation can be attributed to appropriate prophylaxis, field sterilisation, and surgical technique. For those implants that do become infected, often erectile function can be preserved by immediate antibiotic coverage combined with salvage procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 352
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and clinical management on inflatable penile prosthesis made in China
    Li, Z.
    Huang, Y.
    Zhu, X. W.
    Zhu, X. H.
    Wang, Y. X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2005, 28 : 127 - 127
  • [22] Use of the AMS inflatable penile prosthesis in the management of erectile impotence
    Rogers, E
    Murphy, DM
    IRISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 90 (03) : 105 - 106
  • [23] Mechanical Therapy After Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: A Scoping Review
    Alla, K. Khalaf
    Calopedos, R.
    Pham, R.
    Wang, R.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [24] A Review of Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction With Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Shah, Tejash
    Wang, Run
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (02) : 350 - 357
  • [25] Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in the Ambulatory Setting: A Systematic Review
    Segal, Robert L.
    Siegelbaum, Marc H.
    Lerner, Brad D.
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2020, 8 (02) : 338 - 347
  • [26] INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS FAILURE AND COMPLICATIONS: REVIEW OF A NATIONAL DATABASE
    Hagedorn, Judith C.
    Osbun, Nathan
    Lundy, Scott
    Miest, Tanner
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E43 - E44
  • [27] "NO TOUCH" TECHNIQUE DECREASES RISK OF INFECTION IN INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION
    Eid, J. F.
    Wilson, S.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 : 41 - 41
  • [28] Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection?
    Garber, BB
    Marcus, SM
    UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) : 291 - 293
  • [29] Infection reduction using antibiotic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis
    Wilson, Steven K.
    Zumbe, Jurgen
    Henry, Gerard D.
    Salem, Emad A.
    Delk, John R.
    Cleves, Mario A.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (02) : 337 - 340
  • [30] Learning curve for inflatable penile prosthesis
    Barrier, A.
    Marcelli, F.
    Villers, A.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2019, 29 (17): : 947 - 954