Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38

被引:66
|
作者
Cake, Martin A. [1 ]
Bell, Melinda A. [1 ]
Williams, Julie C. [2 ]
Brown, Fiona J. L. [3 ]
Dozier, Marshall [3 ]
Rhind, Susan M. [3 ]
Baillie, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Vet Med, South St, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Oral & Dent Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Vet Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
COMPANION-ANIMAL PRACTICE; CLIENT-PATIENT COMMUNICATION; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT; CAREER SUCCESS; SUPPORT NEEDS; SKILLS; SATISFACTION; ATTRIBUTES; CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173662
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear.Aim: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success.Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source.Results: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience.Conclusions: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 563
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review of: What works best for health professions students using mobile (hand-held) devices for educational support on clinical placements? BEME Guide No. 52
    Maudsley, Gillian
    Taylor, David
    Allam, Omnia
    Garner, Jayne
    Calinici, Tudor
    Linkman, Ken
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (02) : 125 - 140
  • [22] BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education - Part 2: Constructing searches
    Haig, A
    Dozier, M
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2003, 25 (05) : 463 - 484
  • [23] Remote learning developments in postgraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic - A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 71
    Khamees, Deena
    Peterson, William
    Patricio, Madalena
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Commissaris, Carolyn
    Austin, Andrea
    Davis, Mallory
    Spadafore, Maxwell
    Griffith, Max
    Hider, Ahmad
    Pawlik, Cameron
    Stojan, Jennifer
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Uraiby, Hussein
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Gordon, Morris
    Daniel, Michelle
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (05) : 466 - 485
  • [24] A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8
    Steinert, Yvonne
    Mann, Karen
    Centeno, Angel
    Dolmans, Diana
    Spencer, John
    Gelula, Mark
    Prideaux, David
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2006, 28 (06) : 497 - 526
  • [25] Structure and impact of longitudinal Graduate Medical Education curricula designed to prepare future clinician-educators: A systematic scoping review: BEME Guide No. 74
    Yang, Yihan
    Gielissen, Katherine
    Brown, Bryan
    Spak, Judy M.
    Windish, Donna M.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (09) : 947 - 961
  • [26] Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13
    Hammick, Marilyn
    Dornan, Timothy
    Steinert, Yvonne
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2010, 32 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [27] Pivot to online learning for adapting or continuing workplace-based clinical learning in medical education following the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 70
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Uraiby, Hussein
    Gordon, Morris
    Clarke, Nicola
    Rees, Eliot
    Park, Sophie
    Pammi, Mohan
    Alston, Sebastian
    Khamees, Deena
    Peterson, William
    Stojan, Jennifer
    Pawlik, Cameron
    Hider, Ahmad
    Daniel, Michelle
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (03) : 227 - 243
  • [28] A critical hybrid realist-outcomes systematic review of relationships between medical education programmes and communities: BEME Guide No. 35
    Ellaway, R. H.
    O'Gorman, L.
    Strasser, R.
    Marsh, D. C.
    Graves, L.
    Fink, P.
    Cervin, C.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (03) : 229 - 245
  • [29] A critical review of cultural competence frameworks and models in medical and health professional education: A meta-ethnographic synthesis: BEME Guide No. 79
    Li, Shuangyu
    Miles, Katherine
    George, Riya E.
    Ertubey, Candan
    Pype, Peter
    Liu, Jia
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2023, 45 (10) : 1085 - 1107
  • [30] A BEME (Best Evidence in Medical Education) systematic review of the use of workplace-based assessment in identifying and remediating poor performance among postgraduate medical trainees
    Barrett A.
    Galvin R.
    Steinert Y.
    Scherpbier A.
    O'Shaughnessy A.
    Horgan M.
    Horsley T.
    Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)