Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38

被引:66
|
作者
Cake, Martin A. [1 ]
Bell, Melinda A. [1 ]
Williams, Julie C. [2 ]
Brown, Fiona J. L. [3 ]
Dozier, Marshall [3 ]
Rhind, Susan M. [3 ]
Baillie, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Vet Med, South St, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Oral & Dent Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Vet Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
COMPANION-ANIMAL PRACTICE; CLIENT-PATIENT COMMUNICATION; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT; CAREER SUCCESS; SUPPORT NEEDS; SKILLS; SATISFACTION; ATTRIBUTES; CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173662
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear.Aim: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success.Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source.Results: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience.Conclusions: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 563
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Non-technical skills assessments in undergraduate medical education: A focused BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 54
    Gordon, Morris
    Farnan, Jeanne
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Ahmed, Ridwaan
    Gurbutt, Dawne
    McLachlan, John
    Daniel, Michelle
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (07) : 732 - 745
  • [2] Teaching professionalism in medical education: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25
    Birden, Hudson
    Glass, Nel
    Wilson, Ian
    Harrison, Michelle
    Usherwood, Tim
    Nass, Duncan
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (07) : E1252 - E1266
  • [3] Patient/service user involvement in medical education: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58
    Gordon, Morris
    Gupta, Simon
    Thornton, Debra
    Reid, Michael
    Mallen, Ernie
    Melling, Angela
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (01) : 4 - 16
  • [4] Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80
    Daniel, Michelle
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Wooten, Darcy
    Stojan, Jennifer
    Haas, Mary R. C.
    Bailey, Jacob
    Evans, Sean
    Lee, Daniel
    Goldberg, Charles
    Fernandez, Jorge
    Jassal, Simerjot K.
    Rudolf, Frances
    Guluma, Kama
    Lander, Lina
    Pott, Emily
    Goldhaber, Nicole H.
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Uraiby, Hussain
    Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
    Gordon, Morris
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    Corral, Janet
    Partha, Indu
    Kolman, Karyn B.
    Westrick, Jennifer
    Dolmans, Diana
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (12) : 1313 - 1331
  • [5] Utility of selection methods for specialist medical training: A BEME (best evidence medical education) systematic review: BEME guide no. 45
    Roberts, Chris
    Khanna, Priya
    Rigby, Louise
    Bartle, Emma
    Llewellyn, Anthony
    Gustavs, Julie
    Newton, Libby
    Newcombe, James P.
    Davies, Mark
    Thistlethwaite, Jill
    Lynam, James
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [6] BEME Guide No. 1: Best evidence medical education
    Harden, RM
    Grant, J
    Buckley, G
    Hart, IR
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 1999, 21 (06) : 553 - 562
  • [7] A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9
    Hammick, M.
    Freeth, D.
    Koppel, I.
    Reeves, S.
    Barr, H.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (08) : 735 - 751
  • [8] The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11
    Buckley, Sharon
    Coleman, Jamie
    Davison, Ian
    Khan, Khalid S.
    Zamora, Javier
    Malick, Sadia
    Morley, David
    Pollard, David
    Ashcroft, Tamasine
    Popovic, Celia
    Sayers, Jayne
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (04) : 340 - 355
  • [9] Collaborative healthcare education programmes for continuing professional education in low and middle-income countries: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 65
    Hill, Elaine
    Gurbutt, Dawne
    Makuloluwa, Thamasi
    Gordon, Morris
    Georgiou, Rachel
    Roddam, Hazel
    Seneviratne, Sujatha
    Byrom, Anna
    Pollard, Kerry
    Abhayasinghe, Kalpani
    Chance-Larsen, Kenneth
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2021, 43 (11) : 1228 - 1241
  • [10] A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32
    Park, Sophie
    Khan, Nada F.
    Hampshire, Mandy
    Knox, Richard
    Malpass, Alice
    Thomas, James
    Anagnostelis, Betsy
    Newman, Mark
    Bower, Peter
    Rosenthal, Joe
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Iliffe, Steve
    Heneghan, Carl
    Band, Amanda
    Georgieva, Zoya
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (07) : 611 - 630