A method for incorporating heterogeneity in measuring the economic carrying capacity of urban infrastructures

被引:7
|
作者
Cui, Xinxin [1 ,2 ]
Du, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Zou, Patrick X. W. [2 ,3 ]
Lu, Cheng [4 ]
Li, Yaxian [2 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Ctr Green Engn & Sustainable Dev, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Changan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Changan Univ, Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Highway Infrastruct Digitalizat, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Changan Univ, Coll Transportat Engn, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Economic carrying capacity; Urban infrastructure; Heterogeneity; Meta-frontier slack based measurement model; Sustainable development; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; GROWTH; EFFICIENCY; INDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The economic carrying capacity of urban infrastructures (UIECC) refers to the ability that the urban infrastructures should have in order to achieve the goal of sustainable development of the urban economy. The UIECC is a crucial factor in the sustainable development of a city. Insufficient UIECC would cause many social problems. Different cities may have many differences in infrastructure construction, economic development and policy support, which lead to heterogeneity among them. If different cities are evaluated under a unified economic standard and criteria, the measurement results would be inaccurate. Therefore, the urban heterogeneity should be considered when calculating UIECC. Through review of literature, which includes indicator selection criteria and policy guidelines, this study establishes an indicator system of UIECC from the joint perspectives of carrier and load. Then, we developed a new UIECC evaluation method that considers heterogeneity, by combining the entropy weight method, the linear weighted sum method and the meta-frontier slack based measurement model. The meta-frontier slack based measurement model considers the slack variables and divides cities into different groups according to the heterogeneity between the cities, which makes the measurement results more accurate and more realistic. Following that, a study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region was conducted using data covering a period of 14 years (2004-2017) to demonstrate the application of the UIECC model. The results show that: 1) the model developed is applicable and effective for evaluating the UIECC; 2) the existence of heterogeneity hinders the coordinated development of cities; 3) the UIECC potential varies significantly between cities. Based on the results, the following suggestions are proposed: 1) It is important to take heterogeneous measures into consideration to improve the UIECC in the future according to development plans among cities; 2) It is necessary to remove the restrictions on infrastructure imposed by the administrative division between cities; 3) when planning infrastructure development, one should adapt a combined perspective of regional development and economic structure optimization.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel evaluation method for urban infrastructures carrying capacity
    Wang, Jinhuan
    Ren, Yitian
    Shen, Liyin
    Liu, Zhi
    Wu, Ying
    Shi, Fangchen
    CITIES, 2020, 105
  • [2] An improved method for investigating urban municipal infrastructures carrying capacity
    Shen, Liyin
    Chen, Xi
    Du, Xiaoyun
    Yang, Zhenchuan
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 29 : 299 - 310
  • [3] Economic perspective-based analysis on urban infrastructures carrying capacity - A China study
    Wang, Jinhuan
    Ren, Yitian
    Shu, Tianheng
    Shen, Liyin
    Liao, Xia
    Yang, Nan
    He, Hongman
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 83
  • [4] An alternative model for evaluating the balance of carrying capacity between functional urban infrastructures
    Wang, Jinhuan
    Shen, Liyin
    Ren, Yitian
    Wei, Xiaoxuan
    Tan, Yongtao
    Shu, Tianheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 79
  • [5] An alternative method for assessing urban transportation carrying capacity
    Wei, Xiaoxuan
    Shen, Liyin
    Li, Jiayu
    Du, Xiaoyun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [6] Measuring environmental carrying capacity
    Liu, Renzhi
    Wang, Chengwen
    Hao, Jiming
    Su, Baolin
    Ma, Yongliang
    Yingyong Jichu yu Gongcheng Kexue Xuebao/Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2009, 17 (01): : 49 - 61
  • [7] A New Method Applied in the Regional Evaluation of Urban Comprehensive Carrying Capacity
    Zhu Lifang
    Liu Yang
    Zhou Li
    Wang Zhenqin
    2019 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA ANALYTICS (ICBDA 2019), 2019, : 389 - 393
  • [8] Research on Calculation Method of Line Carrying Capacity for Urban Rail Transit
    Wei Y.
    Xia Y.
    Lai Y.
    Zhongguo Tiedao Kexue/China Railway Science, 2018, 39 (02): : 112 - 118
  • [9] RISK ZONING - RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MEASURING CARRYING CAPACITY
    GREIST, DA
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1975, 73 (11) : 711 - 714
  • [10] The environment, carrying capacity and economic growth
    Schindler, DW
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (01) : 17 - 19