Propensity score analysis of early and late outcome after redo off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

被引:19
|
作者
Vohra, Hunaid A. [1 ]
Bahrami, Toufan [1 ]
Farid, Shakil [1 ]
Mafi, Ahmed [1 ]
Dreyfus, Gilles [1 ]
Amrani, Mohammad [1 ]
Gaer, Jullien A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harefield Hosp, Royal Brompton & HArefield NHS Trust, Dept Cardiac Surg, Harefield UB9 6JH, Middx, England
关键词
oncab; opcab; redo;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.11.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare early and late results of redo-CABG with (redo-ONCAB) and without (redo-OPCAB) cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: From April 2001 to September 2006 redo-CABG was performed in 110 patients (redo-ONCAB = 50 and redo-CPCAB = 60). Applying the propensity score, 43 OPCAB patients were matched with 43 ONCAB patients. The mean EuroScore was 5 +/- 4.7 and 5 +/- 3.4 for redo-ONCAB and redo-OPCAB, respectively (p = 0.5). The number of diseased coronary arteries was 3 +/- 0.5 and 2 +/- 0.8 in redo-ONCAB and redo-OPCAB, respectively (p < 0.01). Results: Twelve patients underwent CPCAB through anterior thoracotomy while the rest of the patients (n = 74) underwent median sternotomy. Mean number of grafts performed was 3 +/- 0.8 in redo-ONCAB and 2 +/- 0.6 in redo-OPCAB (p < 0.05). The need for postoperative insertion of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was higher (p = 0.02) in redo-ONCAB (n = 9, 21%) than redo-OPCAB (n = 1, 2%). The duration of postoperative ventilation was 55 +/- 98.7 h for redo-ONCAB and 10 +/- 12.8 h for redo-OPCAB (p = 0.008). No differences were found in the incidence of other postoperative complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.9% for redo-ONCAB (n = 3) and 2.3% redo-OPCAB (n = 1; p = NS). Mean follow-up for redo-ONCAB was 30 +/- 21.3 months (range 0.1-63 months) and that of redo-CPCAB was 37 +/- 19.2 months (0.1-62.5 months). Actuarial survival at 5 years was 87 +/- 5.5% for redo-ONCAB and 95 +/- 3.2% for redo-OPCAB (p = 0.17). Event-free survival was 71 +/- 8.0% for redo-CNCAB and 78 +/- 7.2% for redo-OPCAB (p = 0.32). Conclusion: OPCAB is an acceptable strategy in selected patients requiring redo-CABG. Employing a strategy of CPCAB for those patients with 2 or fewer lesions and ONCAB for those with more diffuse disease, redo-OPCAB and redo-ONCAB have similar early and [ate outcomes. (c) 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Pengbin
    Wang, Liping
    Zhai, Kerong
    Huang, Jian
    Wang, Weifan
    Ma, Qi
    Liu, Debin
    Gao, Bingren
    Li, Yongnan
    PERFUSION-UK, 2021, 36 (07): : 724 - 736
  • [22] On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly: Predictors of adverse outcome
    Ricci, M
    Karamanoukian, HL
    D'Ancona, G
    Bergsland, J
    Salerno, TA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2001, 16 (06) : 458 - 466
  • [23] Postoperative functional outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using gated myocardial SPECT: A comparison by propensity score analysis
    Lee J.J.
    Kang W.J.
    Paeng J.C.
    Lee D.S.
    Kim K.-B.
    Chung J.-K.
    Lee M.C.
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2010, 44 (2) : 110 - 115
  • [24] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses
    Kuss, Oliver
    von Salviati, Benita
    Boergermann, Jochen
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 140 (04): : 829 - U128
  • [25] Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting REPLY
    Lamy, Andre
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Yusuf, Salim
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (06): : 578 - 578
  • [26] Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting REPLY
    Lamy, Andre
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Yusuf, Salim
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (02): : 196 - 196
  • [27] On-pump vs off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting - Reply
    Puskas, JD
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (02): : 169 - 170
  • [28] Results of On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Bolourian, Ali Asghar
    Foroughi, Mahnoosh
    Beheshty, Mahmood
    Hekmat, Manouchehr
    Majidi, Masood
    Hassantash, Seyed Ahmad
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (01): : 358 - 358
  • [29] Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a dilemma in elderly
    Sharma D.
    Sisodia A.
    Devgarha S.
    Mathur R.M.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, 32 (2) : 97 - 102
  • [30] Mortality and Readmissions After On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Bianco, Valentino
    Kilic, Arman
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Navid, Forozan
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (07) : 821 - 825