Interval cancers in the Antwerp European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer study, using a 6 year screening interval

被引:5
|
作者
Nelen, Vera [1 ]
Thys, Guy [1 ]
Hermans, Annemie [2 ]
D'Hooge, Kristien [1 ]
Dourcy-Belle-Rose, Brigitte [2 ]
Coebergh, Jan-Willem [3 ]
Roobol, Monique [4 ]
Denis, Louis [2 ]
机构
[1] Prov Inst Hyg, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Ctr Oncol, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer screening; Epidemiology; Interval cancers; Screening interval; ERSPC; ROTTERDAM; ERSPC; SECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) was initiated to evaluate the effect of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening on prostate cancer mortality. Variations in screening modalities between participating centres, such as the interval between screening rounds are likely to affect the outcome of screening. Methods: The study describes the number and characteristics of interval cancers in men in the screening arm of the Antwerp ERSPC aged 55-65 years at the time of randomisation and participating in the screening rounds they were invited for. The interval between the first screening rounds was 6 years on average. Interval cancers were defined as cancers diagnosed during the screening interval but not detected by screening. Cases with a positive screening test were considered as interval cancers if diagnosis through biopsy occurred more than 1 year after screening. Interval cancer cases were identified through linkage with cancer registries. Aggressive interval cancer was defined as cancer with at least one of the following characteristics: stage M1 or N1, Gleason score higher than 7 or World Health Organisation (WHO) score of 3. Results: The 10 year cumulative incidence of interval cancers was 3.0% (n = 50) and the cumulative incidence of aggressive interval cancers was 0.5% (n = 8). During the first screening interval 36 interval cancers were detected. Of these 20 (55.6%) were detected more than 4 years after the initial screening and 5 (13.9%) were considered aggressive. All aggressive interval cancers emerged more than 4 years after initial screening. Conclusion: The occurrence of interval cancers in this study was higher than in the ERSPC centres that used a shorter screening interval. Aggressive interval cancers only started to emerge 4 years after initial screening. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3090 / 3094
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interval cancers following breast cancer screening in Singaporean women
    Gao, F
    Chia, KS
    Ng, FC
    Ng, EH
    Machin, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 101 (05) : 475 - 479
  • [32] Contamination by opportunistic screening in the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening
    Ciatto, S
    Zappa, M
    Villers, A
    Paez, A
    Otto, S
    Auvinen, A
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 : 97 - 100
  • [33] Screening for Prostate Cancer: Results of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Kranse, Ries
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Leenders, Arno G. J. L. H.
    Blijenberg, Bert G.
    van Schaik, Ron H. N.
    Kirkels, Wim J.
    Otto, Suzie J.
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (04) : 530 - 539
  • [34] THE IMPACT OF INTERVAL CANCERS IN FOBT SCREENING ON ADJUSTMENT TO A CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS SCREENING
    Miles, Anne
    McClements, Paula
    Steele, Robert
    Redeker, Claudia
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Wardle, Jane
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 47 : S235 - S235
  • [35] Association between Screening Mammography Recall Rate and Interval Cancers in the UK Breast Cancer Service Screening Program: A Cohort Study
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Vulkan, Daniel
    Blanks, Roger G.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [36] Interval cancers in breast cancer screening: mistakes by the radiolgists or a special group of cancers?
    Wang, H
    Bjurstam, N
    Bjorndal, H
    Braaten, A
    Eriksen, L
    Skaane, P
    Vitak, B
    Hofvind, S
    Thoresen, SO
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, : 32 - 32
  • [37] Optimal prostate-specific antigen screening interval for prostate cancer
    Kobayashi, D.
    Takahashi, O.
    Fukui, T.
    Glasziou, P. P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (05) : 1250 - 1253
  • [38] DISEASE-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL IN MEN WITH INTERVAL CANCERS COMPARED TO MEN WITH CANCERS IN THE CONTROL ARM: LONG-TERM RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER (ERSPC)
    Zhu, X.
    Van Leeuwen, P. J.
    Bul, M.
    Bangma, C. H.
    Schroder, F. H.
    Roobol, M. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 35 - 35
  • [39] Intermediate endpoints of prostate cancers detected in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Section Rotterdam
    Van der Cruijsen-Koeter, I. W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 274 - 274
  • [40] Re: Screening and Prostate Cancer Mortality: Results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 Years of Follow-up
    van Rij, Simon
    Murphy, Declan G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (06) : 1187 - 1188