Noise evaluation of prompt-gamma technique for proton-therapy range verification using a Compton Camera

被引:0
|
作者
Ortega, P. G. [1 ]
Torres-Espallardo, I. [2 ]
Boehlen, T. T. [3 ]
Cerutti, F. [1 ]
Chin, M. P. W. [1 ]
Ferrari, A. [1 ]
Gillam, J. E. [2 ,5 ]
Lacasta, C. [2 ]
Llosa, G. [2 ]
Oliver, J. [2 ]
Rafecas, M. [2 ]
Sala, P. R. [4 ]
Solevi, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
[2] Univ Valencia CSIC, IFIC, Valencia 46071, Spain
[3] Med Austron, A-2700 Vienna, Austria
[4] INFN, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Hadrontherapy; Compton Cameras; prompt-gamma; FLUKA; MLEM; range verification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Real-time monitoring techniques are receivng increased attention due to their great potential for improving the precision of treatment delivery for hadron-therapy (HT). The study of prompt-gamma (PG) focuses on the energetic photon radiation exiting the patient few nanoseconds after the beam irradiation. Its high intensity compared to other similar technologies like in-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and good correlation with the original dose deposition profile are promising features. On the other hand, the use of neutral particles to monitor the dose comes together with a high noise background, mainly due to neutrons and scattered gamma which are uncorrelated with the original dose map. The search of a robust detector that fully exploits the information from PG is still a matter of research. Compton Cameras (CC) have been proposed for PG real-time dose monitoring mainly due to their good time and spatial resolution and their lack of mechanical collimation, which worsen the intrinsic PG high intensity. Conventional CC are based on one or more scatterers and an absorber. The incoming gamma direction requires at least two interactions in different layers, assuming the gamma energy is known. However, the broad PG energy spectrum in HT makes it impossible to know in advance the energy of the gamma. Therefore, three interactions are more suitable to determine the gamma Compton cone. Nevertheless, two interactions can be still used, if the incoming energy is included as a part of the reconstruction inverse problem (4D spectral reconstruction). The noise scenario is thus different depending if two or three interactions are employed. For that reason, the expected reconstructed image can be affected differently by spurious data, such as random coincidences and pile-up in the detector from high intensity beams. In this work, a Monte Carlo (MC) based study is carried out with the aim of evaluating the impact of different noise sources (neutrons, random coincidences and pile-up) for range determination. The complete chain of detection, from the beam particle impinging on a phantom to the event reconstruction, is simulated using FLUKA. The range location is later estimated from the reconstructed image obtained from a 2 and 3 interaction algorithm based on Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization (MLEM).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Noise evaluation of Compton camera imaging for proton therapy
    Ortega, P. G.
    Torres-Espallardo, I.
    Cerutti, F.
    Ferrari, A.
    Gillam, J. E.
    Lacasta, C.
    Llosa, G.
    Oliver, J. F.
    Sala, P. R.
    Solevi, P.
    Rafecas, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (05): : 1845 - 1863
  • [22] Evaluation of a multistage CdZnTe Compton camera for prompt γ imaging for proton therapy
    McCleskey, M.
    Kaye, W.
    Mackin, D. S.
    Beddar, S.
    He, Z.
    Polf, J. C.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2015, 785 : 163 - 169
  • [23] Computational model for detector timing effects in Compton-camera based prompt-gamma imaging for proton radiotherapy
    Maggi, Paul
    Peterson, Steve
    Panthi, Rajesh
    Mackin, Dennis
    Yang, Hao
    He, Zhong
    Beddar, Sam
    Polf, Jerimy
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (12):
  • [24] Evaluation of strategies for dose reconstruction from prompt-gamma radiation in proton therapy
    Foglia, B.
    Gianoli, C.
    Masuda, T.
    Bortfeld, T.
    Verburg, J.
    Parodi, K.
    Pinto, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1540 - S1542
  • [25] Imaging of Prompt Gamma Rays Emitted During Delivery of Clinical Proton Beams with a Compton Camera: Feasibility Studies for Range Verification
    Polf, J.
    Avery, S.
    Mackin, D.
    Beddar, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3679 - 3679
  • [26] Multi-slit prompt-gamma camera for locating of distal dose falloff in proton therapy
    Park, Jong Hoon
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Ku, Youngmo
    Kim, Chan Hyeong
    Lee, Han Rim
    Jeong, Jong Hwi
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Shin, Dong Ho
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 51 (05) : 1406 - 1416
  • [27] Imaging of prompt gamma rays emitted during delivery of clinical proton beams with a Compton camera: feasibility studies for range verification
    Polf, Jerimy C.
    Avery, Stephen
    Mackin, Dennis S.
    Beddar, Sam
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (18): : 7085 - 7099
  • [28] Quantitative Comparison of Two Prompt-Gamma Image Reconstruction Algorithms Using Compton Camera Detection Systems
    Lozano, I. I. Valencia
    Dedes, G.
    Mackin, D. S.
    Zoglauer, A.
    Draeger, E.
    Chen, H.
    Beddar, S.
    Aldawood, S.
    Liprandi, S.
    Miani, A.
    Mayerhofer, M.
    Thirolt, P. G.
    Polf, J. C.
    Parodi, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3010 - 3010
  • [29] REAL-TIME PROTON BEAM RANGE MONITORING BY MEANS OF PROMPT-GAMMA DETECTION WITH A COLLIMATED CAMERA
    Roellinghoff, F.
    Benilov, A.
    Dauvergne, D.
    Dedes, G.
    Freud, N.
    Krimmer, J.
    Letang, J. M.
    Prieels, D.
    Ray, C.
    Richard, M. H.
    Smeets, J.
    Stichelbaut, F.
    Testa, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 102 : S120 - S121
  • [30] Real-time proton beam range monitoring by means of prompt-gamma detection with a collimated camera
    Roellinghoff, F.
    Benilov, A.
    Dauvergne, D.
    Dedes, G.
    Freud, N.
    Janssens, G.
    Krimmer, J.
    Letang, J. M.
    Pinto, M.
    Prieels, D.
    Ray, C.
    Smeets, J.
    Stichelbaut, F.
    Testa, E.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (05): : 1327 - 1338