Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Proton Therapy, or Conformal Radiation Therapy and Morbidity and Disease Control in Localized Prostate Cancer

被引:350
|
作者
Sheets, Nathan C. [1 ]
Goldin, Gregg H. [1 ]
Meyer, Anne-Marie [2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yang [4 ]
Chang, YunKyung [5 ]
Stuermer, Til [6 ]
Holmes, Jordan A. [1 ,3 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [4 ,7 ]
Godley, Paul A. [2 ,4 ]
Carpenter, William R. [2 ,4 ,7 ]
Chen, Ronald C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
来源
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SEER-MEDICARE DATA; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; DOSE-ESCALATION; 70; GY; RADIOTHERAPY; URINARY; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2012.460
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context There has been rapid adoption of newer radiation treatments such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy despite greater cost and limited demonstrated benefit compared with previous technologies. Objective To determine the comparative morbidity and disease control of IMRT, proton therapy, and conformal radiation therapy for primary prostate cancer treatment. Design, Setting, and Patients Population-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked data from 2000 through 2009 for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Main Outcome Measures Rates of gastrointestinal and urinary morbidity, erectile dysfunction, hip fractures, and additional cancer therapy. Results Use of IMRT vs conformal radiation therapy increased from 0.15% in 2000 to 95.9% in 2008. In propensity score-adjusted analyses (N=12 976), men who received IMRT vs conformal radiation therapy were less likely to receive a diagnosis of gastrointestinal morbidities (absolute risk, 13.4 vs 14.7 per 100 person-years; relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96) and hip fractures (absolute risk, 0.8 vs 1.0 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93) but more likely to receive a diagnosis of erectile dysfunction (absolute risk, 5.9 vs 5.3 per 100 person-years; RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients were less likely to receive additional cancer therapy (absolute risk, 2.5 vs 3.1 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89). In a propensity score-matched comparison between IMRT and proton therapy (n=1368), IMRT patients had a lower rate of gastrointestinal morbidity (absolute risk, 12.2 vs 17.8 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.79). There were no significant differences in rates of other morbidities or additional therapies between IMRT and proton therapy. Conclusions Among patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, the use of IMRT compared with conformal radiation therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity and fewer hip fractures but more erectile dysfunction; IMRT compared with proton therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1611-1620
引用
收藏
页码:1611 / 1620
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Carpini, DD
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2001, 81 (04): : 469 - 469
  • [32] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Lee, N. Y.
    Terezakis, S. A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 97 (08) : 691 - 696
  • [33] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Toxicity
    Yu, James B.
    Cramer, Laura D.
    Herrin, Jeph
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    Gross, Cary P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (12) : 1195 - +
  • [34] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy-2 Effective Treatment Modalities for Nasopharyngeal Cancer
    Falchook, Aaron
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (06)
  • [35] Comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy systems
    Verhey, LJ
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) : 78 - +
  • [36] Radiation for Prostate Cancer: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy versus Proton Beam
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : 1089 - 1091
  • [37] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer - Side effects and therapy results
    Lilienthal, A
    Hentschel, B
    Krystek, A
    Oehler, W
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2005, 181 : 4 - 4
  • [38] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer
    Czito, Brian G.
    Pepek, Joseph M.
    Meyer, Jeffrey J.
    Yoo, Sua
    Willett, Christopher G.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2009, 23 (12): : 1082 - 1089
  • [39] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Ling, Diane C.
    Beriwal, Sushil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 112 (04): : 1063 - 1064
  • [40] Template-based Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: A Cost-effective Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Procedure for Prostate Cancer
    Cao, Fred
    Ramaseshan, Ramani
    Cooper, Nancy
    Elith, Craig A.
    Nuraney, Nimet
    Steiner, Peter
    Agranovich, Alex
    Kwan, Winkle
    Liu, Mitchell
    Po, Milton
    Karvat, Anand
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2015, 46 (03) : 325 - 330