RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION IN HIGH-RISK PRESCHOOLS: CRITICAL ISSUES FOR IMPLEMENTATION

被引:19
|
作者
Ball, Carrie R. [1 ]
Trammell, Beth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ball State Univ, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; COMPETING VIEWS; AT-RISK; KINDERGARTEN; CHILDREN; DISABILITIES; FRAMEWORKS; DIALOGUE; STUDENTS; FLUENCY;
D O I
10.1002/pits.20572
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article summarizes the current knowledge of response-to-intervention (RTI) models in preschool settings, with an emphasis on evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of our current research base. Particular attention is given to the unique challenges of high-risk preschool settings. Presently, sufficient empirical support exists to begin establishing tiered intervention systems and building teacher capacity. Lacking, however, are valid and reliable assessment tools and insufficiently trained personnel to support a data-based decision-model within high-risk preschools. We conclude that organizational development should focus on building teacher capacity, establishing high-quality classroom instruction, and planning for sustainable programs, with adoption of a full RTI service delivery model serving as a long-range aspirational goal. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 512
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of a Response-to-Intervention System in General Physical Education
    Stephens, Tammy L.
    Silliman-French, Lisa
    Kinnison, Lloyd
    French, Ron
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION RECREATION AND DANCE, 2010, 81 (09): : 47 - 53
  • [3] CRITICAL ISSUES IN RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION, COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION, AND SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES IDENTIFICATION AND INTERVENTION: AN EXPERT WHITE PAPER CONSENSUS
    Hale, J.
    Alfonso, V.
    Berninger, V.
    Bracken, B.
    Christo, C.
    Clark, E.
    Cohen, M.
    Davis, A.
    Decker, S.
    Denckla, M.
    Dumont, R.
    Elliott, C.
    Feifer, S.
    Fiorello, C.
    Flanagan, D.
    Fletcher-Janzen, E.
    Geary, D.
    Gerber, M.
    Gerner, M.
    Goldstein, S.
    Gregg, N.
    Hagin, R.
    Jaffe, L.
    Kaufman, A.
    Kaufman, N.
    Keith, T.
    Kline, F.
    Kochhar-Bryant, C.
    Lerner, J.
    Marshall, G.
    Mascolo, J.
    Mather, N.
    Mazzocco, M.
    McCloskey, G.
    McGrew, K.
    Miller, D.
    Miller, J.
    Mostert, M.
    Naglieri, J.
    Ortiz, S.
    Phelps, L.
    Podhajski, B.
    Reddy, L.
    Reynolds, C.
    Riccio, C.
    Schrank, F.
    Schultz, E.
    Semrud-Clikeman, M.
    Shaywitz, S.
    Simon, J.
    LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 2010, 33 (03) : 223 - 236
  • [4] “Old Habits Die Hard:” Past and Current Issues Pertaining to Response-to-Intervention
    Alberto F. Restori
    Frank M. Gresham
    Clayton R. Cook
    The California School Psychologist, 2008, 13 (1): : 67 - 78
  • [6] Ethical anal legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities
    Burns, Matthew K.
    Jacob, Susan
    Wagner, Angela R.
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 46 (03) : 263 - 279
  • [7] Professional development, capacity building, and research needs: Critical issues for response to intervention implementation
    Danielson, Louis
    Doolittle, Jennifer
    Bradley, Renee
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 36 (04) : 632 - 637
  • [8] Relationship Between Systems Coaching and Problem-Solving Implementation Fidelity in a Response-to-Intervention Model
    March, Amanda L.
    Castillo, Jose M.
    Batsche, George M.
    Kincaid, Donald
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 32 (02) : 147 - 177
  • [9] Tier 2 Intervention for At-Risk First-Grade Students Within a Response-to-Intervention Model of Support
    Bryant, Diane Pedrotty
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2014, 43 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [10] A Longitudinal Analysis of the Relations Among Professional Development, Educators' Beliefs and Perceived Skills, and Response-to-Intervention Implementation
    Castillo, Jose M.
    Wang, Joy H.
    Daye, Julie G.
    Shum, Kai Zhuang
    March, Amanda L.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTATION, 2018, 28 (04) : 413 - 444