COMPARISON OF OPTIMAL PATH PLANNING ALGORITHMS FOR INTELLIGENT CONTROL OF ROBOTIC PART ASSEMBLY TASK

被引:5
|
作者
Son, Changman [1 ]
机构
[1] DanKook Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Yongin 330714, South Korea
关键词
Path planning algorithms; comparison; fuzzy theory versus neural network; fuzzy entropy; optimality criterion; machine intelligence; uncertainty; fuzziness; vision sensor;
D O I
10.1142/S0218488510006726
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Two intelligent part-bringing (path planning or finding) algorithms, to bring a part from an initial position to an assembly hole or a receptacle (target or destination) for a purpose of part mating, related to a robotic part assembly task are introduced. These algorithms are then compared through simulations and several criteria. An entropy function, which is a useful measure of the variability and the information in terms of uncertainty, is introduced to measure its overall performance of a task execution related to the part-bringing task. Fuzzy set theory, well-suited to a management of uncertainty, is introduced to address an uncertainty associated with the part-bringing procedure. A degree of uncertainty associated with a part-bringing is used as an optimality criterion, or cost function, e.g. minimum fuzzy entropy, for a specific task execution. It is shown that the machine organizer using a sensor system can intelligently determine an optimal control value, based on explicit performance criteria, to overcome environmental uncertainty. The algorithms use knowledge processing functions such as machine reasoning, planning, inferencing, learning, and decision-making. The results show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 644
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Heat Diffusion Method for Intelligent Robotic Path Planning
    Hills, Jeremy
    Zhong, Yongmin
    20TH ISPE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, 2013, : 588 - 602
  • [32] Optimal control of robotic systems with logical constraints: Application to UAV path planning
    Wei, Shangming
    Zefran, Milos
    DeCarlo, Raymond A.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 176 - +
  • [33] Path Planning of Mobile Elastic Robotic Arms by Indirect Approach of Optimal Control
    Korayem, Moharam Habibnejad
    Nohooji, Hamed Rahimi
    Nikoobin, Amin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 8 (01): : 10 - 20
  • [34] An optimal planning technique for an intelligent robot's part assembly in partially unstructured environments
    Son, CM
    ROBOTICA, 1998, 16 : 47 - 57
  • [35] A Survey on Path Planning Algorithms in Robotic Fibre Placement
    Li, Lina
    Xu, De
    Wang, Xingang
    Tan, Min
    2015 27TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2015, : 4704 - 4709
  • [36] Path Planning Algorithms and Their Use in Robotic Navigation Systems
    Teleweck, P. E.
    Chandrasekaran, B.
    2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL ENGINEERING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (CCEAI 2019), 2019, 1207
  • [37] Integrating sensing, task planning, and execution for robotic assembly
    Tung, CP
    Kak, AC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1996, 12 (02): : 187 - 201
  • [38] Soft computing algorithms for intelligent control of a mobile robot for service use Part 2: Path planning, navigation and technology operations
    T. Tanaka
    J. Ohwi
    L. V. Litvintseva
    K. Yamafuji
    S. V. Ulyanov
    Soft Computing, 1997, 1 (2) : 99 - 106
  • [39] A SURVEY OF ASSEMBLY PLANNING BASED ON INTELLIGENT OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS
    Liu, Jihong
    Zeng, Sen
    DETC 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATIONAL IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 3, PTS A AND B: 28TH COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2009, : 1135 - 1141
  • [40] A comparison study on path smoothing algorithms for laser robot navigated mobile robot path planning in intelligent space
    Song, Baoye
    Tian, Guohui
    Zhou, Fengyu
    Journal of Information and Computational Science, 2010, 7 (14): : 2943 - 2950