Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries

被引:5
|
作者
Barais, Marie [1 ]
van de Wiel, Margje W. J. [2 ]
Groell, Nicolas [1 ]
Dany, Antoine [3 ]
Montier, Tristan [4 ]
Van Royen, Paul [5 ]
Stolper, Erik C. F. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Fac Med & Sci Sante, Dept Gen Practice, EA 7479,SPURBO, Brest, France
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Work & Social Psychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Fac Med & Sci Sante, Dept Publ Hlth, EA 7479,SPURBO, Brest, France
[4] Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Fac Med & Sci Sante, Inserm UMR1078, Brest, France
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Primary & Interdisciplinary Care, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Family Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 11期
关键词
feasibility study; questionnaire; gut feelings; family medicine; general practitioners;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023488
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The validated Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) is a 10-item questionnaire based on the definitions of the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance. The purpose of the GFQ is to determine the presence or absence of gut feelings in the diagnostic reasoning of general practitioners (GPs). The aim was to test the GFQ on GPs, in real practice settings, to check whether any changes were needed to improve feasibility, and to calculate the prevalence of the GPs' sense of alarm and sense of reassurance in three different countries. Setting Primary care, six participating centres in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Participants We performed a think-aloud study with 24 experienced Dutch GPs, GP trainees and medical clerks who filled in the GFQ after diagnosing each of six case vignettes. We then performed a feasibility study in two phases, using a mixed-method approach, with 42 French and Dutch GPs in the first phase and then 10 Belgian, 10 Dutch and 10 French GPs in the second phase. All GPs filled in the GFQ after each of eight consultations with patients presenting new complaints and were subsequently interviewed about the use of the GFQ. Outcome measures GPs' experiences on using the GFQ in real practice, more specifically the average time needed for filling in the questionnaire. The prevalence of GPs' sense of alarm and sense of reassurance. Results The modified version of the GFQ, created without altering the sense of the validated items, was easy to use in daily practice. The prevalence of the GPs' sense of alarm occurred during 23%-31% of the included consultations. Conclusions After a two-step study and several minor adaptations, the final version of the GFQ proved to be a feasible and practical tool to be used for prospective observational studies in daily practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using Mobile Health Intervention to Improve Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Diseases in China: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study
    Chen, Shu
    Gong, Enying
    Kazi, Dhruv S.
    Gates, Ann B.
    Bai, Rong
    Fu, Hua
    Peng, Weixia
    De la Cruz, Ginny
    Chen, Lei
    Liu, Xianxia
    Su, Qingjie
    Girerd, Nicolas
    Karaye, Kamilu M.
    Alhabib, Khalid F.
    Yan, Lijing L.
    Schwalm, J. D.
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (01):
  • [32] Using the Translating Research into Practice framework to develop a diabetes prevention intervention in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    Tseng, Eva
    Smith, Katherine
    Clark, Jeanne M.
    Segal, Jodi B.
    Marsteller, Jill A.
    Maruthur, Nisa M.
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [33] Development of a core outcome set for orthodontic trials using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for a multicentre study
    Aliki Tsichlaki
    Kevin O’Brien
    Ama Johal
    Zoe Marshman
    Philip Benson
    Fiorella B. Colonio Salazar
    Padhraig S. Fleming
    Trials, 18
  • [34] Using a reasoned action approach to identify determinants of organized exercise among Hispanics: a mixed-methods study
    Arevalo, Mariana
    Browne, Louis D.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [35] Feasibility of the Translating Innovations into Practice-toolbox (TIP-toolbox): A mixed-methods study for implementing activity innovations in nursing homes
    Kuk, Nienke O.
    Bours, Gerrie J. J. W.
    Hamers, Jan P. H.
    Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M.
    Zijlstra, Rixt
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2017, 38 (06) : 498 - 504
  • [36] Increasing cardiovascular medication adherence: A medical research council complex mhealth intervention mixed-methods feasibility study to inform global practice
    Khonsari, Sahar
    Chandler, Colin
    Parker, Richard
    Holloway, Aisha
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (10) : 2670 - 2684
  • [37] The feasibility, acceptability, cost and benefits of a "communities of practice" model for improving the quality of childcare centres: a mixed-methods study in the informal settlements in Nairobi
    Nampijja, Margaret
    Langat, Nelson
    Oloo, Linda
    Amboka, Patrick
    Okelo, Kenneth
    Muendo, Ruth
    Habib, Sabrina
    Kiyeng, Martin
    Ray, Anna
    Abboah-Offei, Mary
    Kitsao-Wekulo, Patricia
    Kimani-Murage, Elizabeth
    Li, Jinshuo
    Elsey, Helen
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [38] Factors influencing engagement in online dual practice by public hospital doctors in three large cities: A mixed-methods study in China
    Xu, Duo
    Huang, Yushu
    Tsuei, Sian
    Fu, Hongqiao
    Yip, Winnie
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 13
  • [39] Effective situation-based delirium simulation training using flipped classroom approach to improve interprofessional collaborative practice competency: a mixed-methods study
    Kiyoshi Shikino
    Narumi Ide
    Yoko Kubota
    Itsuko Ishii
    Shoichi Ito
    Masatomi Ikusaka
    Ikuko Sakai
    BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [40] "Pain is Subjective": A Mixed-Methods Study of Provider Attitudes and Practices Regarding Pain Management in Sickle Cell Disease Across Three Countries
    Stewart, Kearsley A.
    Parshad-Asnani, Monika
    Wonkam, Ambroise
    Bollinger, John
    Bitoungui, Valentina Ngo
    Wonkam-Tingang, Edmond
    Powell, Jill
    Desronvil, Kathia
    Benson, Kathryn R. K.
    Clark, Abby
    Katz, Madelaine
    Martin, Bianca
    Peterseim, Carolyn
    Williams, Christina
    Young, Nana
    Shah, Nirmish
    Tanabe, Paula
    Babyak, Michael
    Royal, Charmaine D. M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (03) : 474 - 487