Effectiveness of Biofeedback for Primary Headache - A Randomized Controlled Study

被引:4
|
作者
Kolbe, Lisa [1 ]
Eberhardt, Tanya [1 ]
Leinberger, Beate [1 ]
Hinterberger, Thilo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Regensburg, Psychosomat Med, Franz Josef Str Allee 11, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
headache; migraine; non-pharmacologic treatment; outpatient care system; biofeedback; TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE; HEALTH-CARE; MIGRAINE; EFFICACY; PREVALENCE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1055/a-1059-9356
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundBiofeedback-treatment for primary headache is highly recommended. Its expenses are mostly not or not completely covered by health funds, hindering the implementation in the care system. This randomized controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a biofeedback-treatment for primary headache in the outpatient care system all over Germany. MethodsThe participants were divided into a direct treatment-group (n=41) and a waiting control-group (n=29). The treatment was carried out for 8-11 sessions with vasoconstriction-/vasodilation training for migraine, with electromyography training for headache of the tension type (diagnosis according to the criteria of the International Headache Association). Headache characteristics (frequency, duration, intensity) were collected via headache-diary before, during and after the treatment and headache specific disability using the Pain Disability Index before and after the treatment. The waiting group stated additional information of the questionnaires about 3 months before and again ultimately before the start of the treatment. Measurement of the headache specific self-efficacy (Headache Management Self-efficacy Scale) took place every second session. For the collected parameters the effect sizes f(2)or r were computed before in comparison to after the treatment and comparing the treatment-group to the waiting-group. ResultsHeadache characteristics decreased during the time of the study significantly linearly with medium to strong effects (frequency f(2)=0.302, p<0.001, duration f(2)=0.186, p<0.001, mean intensity f(2)=0.502, p<0.001, maximal intensity f(2)=0.546, p<0.001). Using biofeedback the self-efficacy rose significantly (p<0.001, r=0.782), even compared to the waiting time (p<0.001, r=0.604). Additionally the handling of pain, the psychological disability and the disability in everyday life improved significantly. Discussion and ConclusionOverall the effects were comparable to already existing studies. Therefore biofeedback turned out to be efficient against migraine and tension-type headache in the out-patient care setting. By that a better integration in the care system seems to be qualified.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 307
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence
    Norton, C
    Chelvanayagam, S
    Wilson-Barnett, J
    Redfern, S
    Kamm, MA
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 125 (05) : 1320 - 1329
  • [32] A randomized controlled trial of anorectal biofeedback for constipation
    Hart, Stacey L.
    Lee, Janet Waimin
    Berian, Julia
    Patterson, Taryn R.
    del Rosario, Amanda
    Varma, Madhulika G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (04) : 459 - 466
  • [33] Effectiveness of different physiotherapy interventions in the management of cervicogenic headache: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Rani, Monika
    Kaur, Jaspreet
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2022, 30 (02) : 96 - 104
  • [34] A randomized controlled trial of anorectal biofeedback for constipation
    Stacey L. Hart
    Janet Waimin Lee
    Julia Berian
    Taryn R. Patterson
    Amanda del Rosario
    Madhulika G. Varma
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012, 27 : 459 - 466
  • [35] Effectiveness of botulinum toxin type-A in the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized controlled trial
    LaButta, R
    Sartori, R
    Vo, A
    Green, J
    Campbell, W
    Jabbari, B
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (06) : A335 - A335
  • [36] Effectiveness of sustained natural apophyseal glides in females with cervicogenic headache: A randomized controlled trial
    Kashif, Muhammad
    Manzoor, Nosheen
    Safdar, Rimsha
    Khan, Hafsa
    Farooq, Maryam
    Wassi, Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 35 (03) : 597 - 603
  • [37] HOME BIOFEEDBACK THERAPY WITH NOVEL DEVICE VERSUS OFFICE BIOFEEDBACK THERAPY FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Sharma, Amol
    Xiang, Xuelian
    Yan, Yun
    Patcharatrakul, Tanisa
    Parr, Rachael
    Herekar, Anam
    Ayyala, Deepak Nag
    Rao, Satish S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S164 - S165
  • [38] PRIMARY HEADACHE AND THE INCIDENCE OF LIFE EVENTS - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    SACCHETTI, E
    GALA, C
    BUONO, M
    CONTE, G
    PENNATI, A
    VITA, A
    INVERNIZZI, G
    IRCS MEDICAL SCIENCE-BIOCHEMISTRY, 1984, 12 (07): : 610 - 611
  • [39] Effectiveness of intranasal zolmitriptan in acute cluster headache - A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study
    Cittadini, Elizabeth
    May, Arne
    Straube, Andreas
    Evers, Stefan
    Bussone, Gennaro
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 63 (11) : 1537 - 1542
  • [40] Heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with alcohol dependence: a randomized controlled study
    Penzlin, Ana Isabel
    Siepmann, Timo
    Illigens, Ben Min-Woo
    Weidner, Kerstin
    Siepmann, Martin
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2015, 11 : 2619 - 2627