Group Contribution Methods for Phase Equilibrium Calculations

被引:39
|
作者
Gmehling, Juergen [1 ,2 ]
Constantinescu, Dana [2 ]
Schmid, Bastian [2 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Ind Chem, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] DDBST GmbH, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
关键词
g(E)-model; equation of state; electrolyte model; process design; process development; solvent selection; GROUP-CONTRIBUTION EQUATION; VAPOR-LIQUID-EQUILIBRIA; UNIFAC GROUP-CONTRIBUTION; PENG-ROBINSON EQUATION; EXCESS GIBBS ENERGY; SOLVENT ELECTROLYTE SYSTEMS; DORTMUND DATA-BANK; OF-STATE VTPR; ACTIVITY-COEFFICIENTS; INFINITE DILUTION;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123424
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The development and design of chemical processes are carried out by solving the balance equations of a mathematical model for sections of or the whole chemical plant with the help of process simulators. For process simulation, besides kinetic data for the chemical reaction, various pure component and mixture properties are required. Because of the great importance of separation processes for a chemical plant in particular, a reliable knowledge of the phase equilibrium behavior is required. The phase equilibrium behavior can be calculated with the help of modern equations of state or g(E)-models using only binary parameters. But unfortunately, only a very small part of the experimental data for fitting the required binary model parameters is available, so very often these models cannot be applied directly. To solve this problem, powerful predictive thermodynamic models have been developed. Group contribution methods allow the prediction of the required phase equilibrium data using only a limited number of group interaction parameters. A prerequisite for fitting the required group interaction parameters is a comprehensive database. That is why for the development of powerful group contribution methods almost all published pure component properties, phase equilibrium data, excess properties, etc., were stored in computerized form in the Dortmund Data Bank. In this review, the present status, weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, possible applications, and typical results of the different group contribution methods for the calculation of phase equilibria are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 292
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new reduction method for phase equilibrium calculations
    Nichita, Dan Vladimir
    Graciaa, Alain
    FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2011, 302 (1-2) : 226 - 233
  • [22] Phase equilibrium calculations with specified vapor fraction
    Canzian, Estefania Pintor
    Cruz, Arley Alles
    Mazza, Ricardo Augusto
    Franco, Luis Fernando Mercier
    FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2025, 589
  • [23] PERTURBATION METHOD FOR PHASE-EQUILIBRIUM CALCULATIONS
    HENDRIKS, EM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS, 1989, 10 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [24] THERMODYNAMIC MULTICOMPONENT SILICATE PHASE EQUILIBRIUM CALCULATIONS
    BARRON, LM
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1970, 51 (04): : 437 - &
  • [25] THERMODYNAMIC MULTICOMPONENT SILICATE EQUILIBRIUM PHASE CALCULATIONS
    BARRON, LM
    AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, 1972, 57 (5-6) : 809 - &
  • [26] A global MINLP approach for phase equilibrium calculations
    Reneaume, JM
    Meyer, M
    Letourneau, JJ
    Joulia, X
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 20 : S303 - S308
  • [27] Robustness of three-phase equilibrium calculations
    Gorucu, S. E.
    Johns, R. T.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 143 : 72 - 85
  • [28] Application of near critical behavior of equilibrium ratios to phase equilibrium calculations
    Nichita, Dan Vladimir
    Broseta, Daniel
    Montel, Francois
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2019, 74
  • [29] STATUS AND RESULTS OF GROUP CONTRIBUTION METHODS
    GMEHLING, J
    FISCHER, K
    LI, J
    SCHILLER, M
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1993, 65 (05) : 919 - 926
  • [30] GROUP CONTRIBUTION METHODS FOR COAL LIQUIDS
    BEHMANESH, N
    ALLEN, DT
    FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1989, 53 : 423 - 428