Generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature

被引:80
|
作者
Okan, Orkan [1 ]
Lopes, Ester [1 ]
Bollweg, Torsten Michael [1 ]
Broeder, Janine [1 ]
Messer, Melanie [2 ]
Bruland, Dirk [1 ]
Bond, Emma [3 ]
Carvalho, Graca S. [4 ]
Sorensen, Kristine [5 ]
Saboga-Nunes, Luis [6 ]
Levin-Zamir, Diane [7 ,12 ]
Sahrai, Diana [8 ]
Bittlingmayer, Uwe H. [9 ]
Pelikan, Juergen M. [10 ]
Thomas, Malcolm [11 ]
Bauer, Ullrich [1 ]
Pinheiro, Paulo [1 ]
机构
[1] Bielefeld Univ, Fac Educ Sci, Ctr Prevent & Intervent Childhood & Adolescents C, Bielefeld, NRW, Germany
[2] Bielefeld Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Publ Hlth Nursing & Hlth Sci Res, Bielefeld, NRW, Germany
[3] Univ Suffolk, Ipswich, Suffolk, England
[4] Univ Minho, Inst Educ, CIEC, Braga, Portugal
[5] Global Hlth Literacy Acad, Urmond, Netherlands
[6] Univ NOVA Lisboa, ISAMB FMUL, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, CIESP, Lisbon, Portugal
[7] Univ Haifa, Sch Publ Hlth, Haifa, Israel
[8] Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Northwestern Switzerland, Sch Educ, Basel, Switzerland
[9] Univ Educ, Freiburg, Germany
[10] Univ Vienna, Austria & Inst Publ Hlth, Vienna, Austria
[11] Aberystwyth Univ, Sch Educ, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Wales
[12] Dept Hlth Educ & Promot, Clalit Hlth Serv, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Health literacy; Measurement; Assessment; Instrument; Children; Adolescents; Literature review; NEWEST VITAL SIGN; SCHOOL-CHILDREN; PUBLIC-HEALTH; EDUCATION; VALIDATION; CHILDHOOD; CARE; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-018-5054-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Health literacy is an important health promotion concern and recently children and adolescents have been the focus of increased academic attention. To assess the health literacy of this population, researchers have been focussing on developing instruments to measure their health literacy. Compared to the wider availability of instruments for adults, only a few tools are known for younger age groups. The objective of this study is to systematically review the field of generic child and adolescent health literacy measurement instruments that are currently available. Method: A systematic literature search was undertaken in five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycNET, ERIC, and FIS) on articles published between January 1990 and July 2015, addressing children and adolescents <= 18 years old. Eligible articles were analysed, data was extracted, and synthesised according to review objectives. Results: Fifteen generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents were identified. All, except two, are self-administered instruments. Seven are objective measures (performance-based tests), seven are subjective measures (self-reporting), and one uses a mixed-method measurement. Most instruments applied a broad and multidimensional understanding of health literacy. The instruments were developed in eight different countries, with most tools originating in the United States (n = 6). Among the instruments, 31 different components related to health literacy were identified. Accordingly, the studies exhibit a variety of implicit or explicit conceptual and operational definitions, and most instruments have been used in schools and other educational contexts. While the youngest age group studied was 7-year-old children within a parent-child study, there is only one instrument specifically designed for primary school children and none for early years. Conclusions: Despite the reported paucity of health literacy research involving children and adolescents, an unexpected number of health literacy measurement studies in children's populations was found. Most instruments tend to measure their own specific understanding of health literacy and not all provide sufficient conceptual information. To advance health literacy instruments, a much more standardised approach is necessary including improved reporting on the development and validation processes. Further research is required to improve health literacy instruments for children and adolescents and to provide knowledge to inform effective interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health literacy in children with asthma: A systematic review
    Tzeng, Yu-Fen
    Chiang, Bor-Luen
    Chen, Yu-Hsia
    Gau, Bih-Shya
    PEDIATRICS AND NEONATOLOGY, 2018, 59 (05): : 429 - 438
  • [32] Measurement properties of self-report instruments to assess health literacy in older adults: a systematic review
    Slatyer, Susan
    Toye, Christine
    Burton, Elissa
    Jacinto, Alessandro Ferrari
    Hill, Keith D.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (11) : 2241 - 2257
  • [33] Delirium in children and adolescents: A systematic review of the literature
    Hatherill, Sean
    Flisher, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 (04) : 337 - 344
  • [34] Health literacy in the eHealth era: A systematic review of the literature
    Kim, Henna
    Xie, Bo
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (06) : 1073 - 1082
  • [35] Health Literacy and Asthma in Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review
    Vamos, Sandra
    Yeung, Paul
    Mark FitzGerald, J.
    HEALTH BEHAVIOR AND POLICY REVIEW, 2015, 2 (04): : 317 - 332
  • [36] A Systematic Review of the Literature on Health Literacy in Nursing Education
    McCleary-Jones, Voncella
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2016, 41 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [37] Assessment and measurement of health literacy: An integrative review of the literature
    Mancuso, Josephine M.
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2009, 11 (01) : 77 - 89
  • [38] Health literacy instruments developed for the elderly with chronic disease: A literature review
    Putri, Isna Faradiba
    Kadar, Kusrini Semarwati
    Syahrul, Syahrul
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2021, 31 : S769 - S773
  • [39] Prospective memory instruments for the assessment of children and adolescents: a systematic review
    Signori, Vanessa de A.
    Watanabe, Tiago M.
    de Pereira, Ana Paula A.
    PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA, 2024, 37 (01):
  • [40] Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: a systematic review
    Berardi, Anna
    Panuccio, Francescaroberta
    Pilli, Luisa
    Tofani, Marco
    Valente, Donatella
    Galeoto, Giovanni
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (05) : 885 - 896