Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

被引:9
|
作者
Sadeghpour, Alireza [1 ]
Ebrahimpour, Adel [2 ]
Attar, Bahamin [1 ]
Azizian, Zahra [3 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; autogenous graft; hamstring tendons; patellar tendons; SEMITENDINOSUS; GRAFTS; BONE;
D O I
10.4103/jrms.JRMS_939_16
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the patellar versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, fifty patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomized into two equal groups: Those treated with either autogenous patellar tendon grafts (PT group) or HT group grafts. All patients were reviewed immediately after surgery, at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and then at 6 months using the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form. Infection, severity of pain (visual analog scale), duration of rehabilitation, and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Positive pivot shift and Lachman test were considered clinical signs and symptoms of treatment failure. In addition, the absence of the ACL or transverse ACL rather than the posterior oblique ligament is an MRI finding that indicates treatment failure. Results: Comparing changes in pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients first and 6 months after therapy show that pain had been relief significantly (P < 0.001) and ROM dramatically changes (P < 0.001). The average rehabilitation period in the PT group was 13.2 +/- 2.08 weeks whereas in the HT group, it was 9.28 +/- 2.26 weeks. A significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the rehabilitation period (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the normal ROM between the groups (P = 0.32). When the pain severity was considered, a significant difference was found between the PT group and the HT group (P < 0.001). The HT group patients had less knee pain than did the PT group patients. No significant difference in infection rates was seen between two groups (P = 0.66). Conclusion: Considering the better outcomes of HT reconstructions for the two parameters of pain severity and rehabilitation period, we consider HTs to be the ideal graft choice for ACL reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction An 11-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sajovic, Matjaz
    Strahovnik, Andrej
    Dernovsek, Mojca Z.
    Skaza, Katja
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (10): : 2161 - 2169
  • [12] Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts
    L'Insalata J.C.
    Klatt B.
    Fu F.H.
    Harner C.D.
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (4) : 234 - 238
  • [13] A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Differences and similarities
    Roe, J
    Pinczewski, LA
    Russell, VJ
    Salmon, LJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09): : 1337 - 1345
  • [14] A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Shaieb, MD
    Kan, DM
    Chang, SK
    Marumoto, JM
    Richardson, AB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (02): : 214 - 220
  • [15] Preconditioning patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:: a prospective randomized study
    Ejerhed, L
    Kartus, J
    Köhler, K
    Sernert, N
    Brandsson, S
    Karlsson, J
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 9 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [16] Preconditioning patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study
    Lars Ejerhed
    Jüri Kartus
    Kristina Köhler
    Ninni Sernert
    Sveinbjörn Brandsson
    Jon Karlsson
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2001, 9 : 6 - 11
  • [17] Long-term Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A 17-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sajovic, Matjaz
    Stropnik, Domen
    Skaza, Katja
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (08): : 1800 - 1808
  • [18] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Females: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts
    Salem, Hytham S.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Carter, Aaron H.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Freedman, Kevin B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 42 (03) : E295 - E304
  • [19] Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up
    Ejerhed, L
    Kartus, J
    Sernert, N
    Köhler, K
    Karlsson, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [20] Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -: A prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up
    Liden, Mattias
    Ejerhed, Lars
    Sernert, Ninni
    Laxdal, Gauti
    Kartus, Juri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (05): : 740 - 748