The optimal percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a pairwise and network meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Hu, Meng-Jin [1 ]
Tan, Jiang-Shan [1 ]
Jiang, Wen-Yang [1 ]
Gao, Xiao-Jin [1 ]
Yang, Yue-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, State Key Lab Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
关键词
multivessel disease; multivessel revascularization; network meta-analysis; percutaneous coronary intervention; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; CULPRIT-ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; TASK-FORCE; VESSEL; THROMBOLYSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; CARDIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/20406223221078088
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods: Trials that randomized patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease to immediate multivessel PCI, staged multivessel PCI, or culprit-only PCI and prospective observational studies that investigated all-cause death were included. Random effect risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 13 randomized trials with 7627 patients and 21 prospective observational studies with 60311 patients were included. In the pairwise and network meta-analysis based on randomized trials, immediate or staged multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE; RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74) than culprit-only PCI, which was mainly due to lower risks of myocardial infarction (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.88) and revascularization (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.51), without any significant difference in all-cause death (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.04; I-2 =0.0%). However, short-term outcomes were deficient in randomized trials. The results from real-world prospective observational studies suggested that staged multivessel PCI reduced long-term all-cause death (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.71; I-2 =15.6%), whereas immediate multivessel PCI increased short-term all-cause death (RR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.22 to 2.05; I-2 = 43 .8%) relative to culprit-only PCI. Conclusion: For patients in randomized trials, multivessel PCI in an immediate or staged procedure was preferred due to improvements in long-term outcomes. As a supplement, the results in real-world patients derived from prospective observational studies suggested that staged multivessel PCI was superior to immediate multivessel PCI. Therefore, staged multivessel PCI may be the optimal PCI strategy for patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Culprit only or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease
    Jensen, Lisette Okkels
    Thayssen, Per
    Farkas, Dora Kormendine
    Hougaard, Mikkel
    Terkelsen, Christian Juhl
    Tilsted, Hans-Henrik
    Maeng, Michael
    Junker, Anders
    Lassen, Jens Flensted
    Horvath-Puho, Erzsebet
    Sorensen, Henrik Toft
    Thuesen, Leif
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (04) : 456 - 464
  • [22] Re: Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock
    Secemsky, Eric A.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (06) : E59 - E60
  • [23] Culprit versus multivessel coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Vaidya, Satyanarayana R.
    Qamar, Arman
    Arora, Sameer
    Devarapally, Santhosh R.
    Kondur, Ashok
    Kaul, Prashant
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2018, 29 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [24] Culprit Vessel Only versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    Song, Xiantao
    Lv, Shuzheng
    Yuan, Fei
    Xu, Feng
    Zhang, Min
    Li, Wei
    Yan, Shuai
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [25] Percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Kimura K.
    Kosuge M.
    Okuda J.
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2010, 25 (2) : 53 - 59
  • [26] Optimal Strategy for Complete Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Ueyama, Hiroki A.
    Akita, Keitaro
    Kiyohara, Yuko
    Takagi, Hisato
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Wiley, Jose
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Mehran, Roxana
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 85 (01) : 19 - 38
  • [27] Re: Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock Response
    Rhee, Tae-Min
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Kim, Jihoon
    Kim, Hyun Kuk
    Song, Young Bin
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (06) : E60 - E61
  • [28] Current Status of Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Kim, Min Chul
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Kim, Sang Hyung
    Hong, Young Joon
    Kim, Ju Han
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 44 (03) : 131 - 138
  • [29] The optimal strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease: an updated meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials
    Fan, Zhong-Guo
    Gao, Xiao-Fei
    Li, Xiao-Bo
    Mao, Wen-Xing
    Chen, Li-Wen
    Tian, Nai-Liang
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2017, 65 (02): : 148 - 156
  • [30] The efficacy and safety of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention VS transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: A meta-analysis
    Pang, Jun
    Zhang, Zheng
    Yang, Yue-jin
    Li, Na
    Bai, Min
    Peng, Yu
    Zhang, Jin
    Li, Qiang
    Zhang, Bo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (02) : 483 - 488