Postnatal circulation in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing fetal aortic valvuloplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Vorisek, C. N. [1 ,2 ]
Zurakowski, D. [3 ]
Tamayo, A. [1 ,4 ]
Axt-Fliedner, R. [5 ]
Siepmann, T. [1 ,6 ]
Friehs, I. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Dresden Int Univ, Div Hlth Care Sci, Dresden, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Manitoba, Max Rady Fac Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[5] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Giessen, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
关键词
fetal aortic valvuloplasty; fetal cardiac intervention; fetal critical aortic stenosis; postnatal circulation; HYPOPLASTIC LEFT-HEART; NATURAL-HISTORY; EXPERIENCE; DISEASE; VALVE; SELECTION; DILATION; OUTCOMES; FETUSES;
D O I
10.1002/uog.24807
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives Fetal aortic valvuloplasty (FAV) has become a treatment option for critical fetal aortic stenosis (AS) with the goal of preserving biventricular circulation (BVC); however, to date, it is unclear how many patients undergoing FAV achieve BVC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the type of postnatal circulation achieved following FAV. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies investigating postnatal circulation in patients with AS following FAV. Eligible for inclusion were original papers in the English language, published from 2000 to 2020, with at least 12 months of follow-up after birth. Review papers, abstracts, expert opinions, books, editorials and case reports were excluded. The titles and abstracts of all retrieved literature were screened, duplicates were excluded and the full texts of potentially eligible articles were obtained and assessed. The primary endpoint was type of postnatal circulation. Additional assessed outcomes included fetal death, live birth, neonatal death (NND), termination of pregnancy (TOP) and technical success of the FAV procedure. The quality of articles was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (GASP) tool. To estimate the overall proportion of each endpoint, meta-analysis of proportions was employed using a random-effects model. Results The electronic search identified 579 studies, of which seven were considered eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 266 fetuses underwent FAV with median follow-up per study from 12 months to 13.2 years. There were no maternal deaths and only one case of FAV-related maternal complication was reported. Hydrops was present in 29 (11%) patients. The pooled prevalence of BVC and univentricular circulation (UVC) among liveborn patients was 45.8% (95% CI, 39.2-52.4%) and 43.6% (95% CI, 33.9-53.8%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of technically successful FAV procedure was 82.1% (95% CI, 74.3-87.9%), of fetal death it was 16.0% (95% CI, 11.2-22.4%), of TOP 5.7% (95% CI, 2.0-15.5%), of live birth 78.8% (95% CI, 66.5 -87.4%), of NND 8.7% (95% CI, 4.7-15.5%), of palliative care 4.0% (95% CI, 1.9-8.4%) and of infant death 10.3% (95% CI, 3.6-26.1%). The pooled prevalence of BVC and U VC among liveborn patients who had technically successful FAV was 51.9% (95% CI, 44.7-59.1%) and 39.8% (95% CI, 29.7-50.9%), respectively. Conclusions This study showed a BVC rate of 46% among liveborn patients with AS undergoing FAV, which improved to 52% when subjects underwent technically successful FAV. Given the lack of randomized clinical trials, results should be interpreted with caution. Currently, data do not suggest a true benefit of FAV for achieving BVC. (C) 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 584
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incidence of aortic valve reintervention in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Groberio, Julia Goese
    Reginato, Pedro Henrique
    Streit, Rafael Eduardo
    Rocha, Alice Volpato
    Udoma-Udofa, Ofonime Chantal
    de Mesquita, Cynthia Florencio
    Rivera, Andre
    Ulbrich, Anderson Zampier
    Farias, Fabio Rocha
    Gomes, Wilton Francisco
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 73 (01) : 12 - 22
  • [42] Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Chuan
    Liu, Jie
    Qin, Shu
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [43] The prognostic role of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Papanastasiou, C. Christos
    Kokkinidis, D.
    Kampaktsis, P.
    Bikakis, I.
    Cunha, D.
    Oikonomou, E.
    Greenwood, J.
    Garcia, M.
    Karamitsos, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 275 - 275
  • [44] Aortic diameters are dependent on the bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and the degree of aortic stenosis - a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Miskowiec, D.
    Lipiec, P.
    Kupczynska, K.
    Kasprzak, J. D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 1363 - 1363
  • [45] Aortic valve replacement for low gradient aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Valencia Serrano, F.
    Martinez Gonzalez, M. A.
    Gomez Doblas, J. J.
    De Teresa Galvan, E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 187 - 187
  • [46] Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinto, G.
    Villaschi, A.
    Sanz-Sanchez, J.
    Fazzari, F.
    Regazzoli, D.
    Mangieri, A.
    Pini, D.
    Bragato, R. M.
    Colombo, A.
    Reimers, B.
    Condorelli, G.
    Stefanini, G. G.
    Chiarito, M.
    Cannata, F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 1650 - 1650
  • [47] TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION WITH OR WITHOUT PRE-IMPLANTATION BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Ludman, Peter
    de Belder, Mark
    Sponga, Sandro
    Gunning, Mark
    Nolan, James
    Kiaii, Bob
    Diamantouros, Pantelis
    Chu, Michael
    Teefy, Patrick
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 411 - 411
  • [48] Bedside Physical Examination for the Diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shellenberger, Richard A.
    Crass, Stephanie
    Jevicks, Justin
    Badhwar, Ankita
    Albright, Jeremy
    Kumar, Agara
    CJC OPEN, 2023, 5 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [49] Concomitant Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sleiman, Jose
    Khan, Mohammad S.
    Usman, Muhammad S.
    Munoz, Ezequiel
    Ranka, Sagar
    Muhammad, Hassan N.
    Ijeli, Anthonia
    Fatima, Kaneez
    Raza, Sajjad
    Deo, Salil
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [50] AORTIC STENOSIS BASELINE SEVERITY PREDICTS PROGRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Prosperi-Porta, Graeme
    Willner, Nadav
    Unni, Rudy R.
    Lau, Lawrence
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Chan, Kwan
    Beauchesne, Luc Michael
    Burwash, Ian G.
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 1967 - 1967