Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging

被引:31
|
作者
Zhang, Ju [1 ]
Chen, Xiaowei [1 ]
Chen, Dong [2 ]
Wang, Zhenxiong [1 ]
Li, Shihui [1 ]
Zhu, Wenzhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Pathol, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffuse astrocytic tumors; Ki-67; Diffusion kurtosis imaging; Biexponential model; Stretched-exponential model; Diffusion-weighted imaging; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; WATER DIFFUSION; CEREBRAL GLIOMAS; BRAIN; PERFUSION; KI-67; CLASSIFICATION; PARAMETERS; PROGNOSIS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the main parameters derived from monoexponential, biexponential and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) with respect to diagnostic performance for tumor grading and proliferation assessment in diffuse astrocytic tumors (DATs). Materials and methods: Fifty-eight pathologically confirmed DAT patients who underwent DWI and DKI on a 3-T scanner were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Measurements including the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), heterogeneity index (alpha), mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean kurtosis (MK) were compared between tumor grades (II, III, and IV) by using a Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of these parameters. Spearman's rho with the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was calculated for each parameter. Results: MK values differed significantly between all DAT subtypes and increased with grade. The ADC, D, f, DDC, alpha and MD values were significantly higher in grade II tumors than in grade III/IV tumors. D* values were significantly lower in grade II tumors than in grade IV tumors (all P < 0.05). In discriminating between grade II and III tumors, alpha, MK, MD, D and f had significantly greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) values than D* and FA (0.927, 0.901, 0.896, 0.895, and 0.889, respectively vs 0.659 and 0.598, respectively, P < 0.05). In discriminating between grade III and IV tumors, only MK demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.711). MK and D showed a strong correlation with the Ki-67 LI (rho = 0.791 and -0.789, respectively, P < 0.001). D*, f, MD, ADC, DDC and alpha showed a moderate correlation (vertical bar rho vertical bar ranged from 0.415 to 0.698, P < 0.05). Conclusion: MK and D have considerable potential to predict the degree of proliferation of DATs. MK could effectively characterize microstructural changes throughout the malignant transformation of DATs and provided useful complementary information for grading.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 195
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biexponential Signal Attenuation Analysis of Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Breast
    Tamura, Takayuki
    Usui, Shuji
    Murakami, Shigeru
    Arihiro, Koji
    Akyama, Yuji
    Naito, Kumiko
    Akiyama, Mitoshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 9 (04) : 195 - 207
  • [42] Comparison of the monoexponential and biexponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic imaging in grading clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a case-control study
    Cao, Jinfeng
    Dong, Jinye
    Su, Ge
    Zhang, Baohua
    Zhu, Lingchen
    Wang, Min
    Li, Qilin
    Zhang, Lesong
    Wang, Dejian
    Luo, Xin
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (05) : 792 - 801
  • [43] Grading meningiomas using mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Lin, L.
    Xue, Y.
    Duan, Q.
    Chen, X.
    Chen, H.
    Jiang, R.
    Zhong, T.
    Xu, G.
    Geng, D.
    Zhang, J.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (08) : 651.e15 - 651.e23
  • [44] Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging
    Liu, Xiaohang
    Zhou, Liangping
    Peng, Weijun
    Wang, Chaofu
    Wang, He
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (08) : 1318 - 1324
  • [45] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Improved Robustness With Stretched Exponential Modeling
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Afaq, Asim
    Rowe, Daniel B.
    Lu, Yonggang
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Grover, Jarrett
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (06) : 695 - 703
  • [46] Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the liver at 3 Tesla: invivo comparison to standard diffusion-weighted imaging
    Budjan, Johannes
    Sauter, Elke A.
    Zoellner, Frank G.
    Lemke, Andreas
    Wambsganss, Jens
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Attenberger, Ulrike I.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [47] Correlation of Standard Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging With Distant Metastases of Rectal Carcinoma
    Yu, Jing
    Huang, Dong-Ya
    Li, Yan
    Dai, Xin
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (01) : 221 - 229
  • [48] Assessment of paraspinal neurogenic tumors with diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    Ashmalla, Germeen Albair
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (04) : 841 - 846
  • [49] Quantitative analysis for detection and grading of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging
    Li, Hong-Wei
    Yan, Gao-Wu
    Yang, Jin
    Zhuo, Li-Hua
    Bhetuwal, Anup
    Long, Yong-Jun
    Feng, Xu
    Yao, Hong-Chao
    Zou, Xing-Xiong
    Feng, Ruo-Han
    Yang, Han-Feng
    Du, Yong
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 24 (05)
  • [50] Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: Implications for diffusion-weighted imaging
    Niendorf, T
    Dijkhuizen, RM
    Norris, DG
    Campagne, MV
    Nicolay, K
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (06) : 847 - 857