A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections

被引:206
|
作者
Noel, Gary J. [1 ]
Bush, Karen [1 ]
Bagchi, Partha [1 ]
Ianus, Juliana [1 ]
Strauss, Richard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/526527
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections due to either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria was conducted to compare ceftobiprole monotherapy with treatment with vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Methods. Patients were randomized 2: 1 to receive ceftobiprole or to receive vancomycin plus ceftazidime. Outcomes were determined at a test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after completion of therapy) and were analyzed for all patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, as well as for subgroups, on the basis of major types of infections and severity of disease. Results. Among the clinically evaluable and the intent-to-treat populations, clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were similar in the ceftobiprole and comparator treatment arms (clinical cure rate, 90.5% [439 of 485 patients] and 90.2% [220 of 244 patients] in the clinically evaluable population, respectively; 81.9% [448 of 547 patients] and 80.8% [227 of 281 patients] in the intent-to-treat population, respectively). Clinical cure rates in ceftobiprole-treated patients ranged from 86.2% (125 of 145 patients) among those with diabetes who had foot infections to 93.0% (80 of 86 patients) among those with cellulitis. Among patients treated with ceftobiprole, clinical cure rates were similar among patients from whom gram-negative bacteria were isolated (87.9% [109 of 124 patients]) and among patients from whom gram-positive bacteria were isolated (91.8% [292 of 318 patients]) and were not statistically different from the clinical cure rates among comparator-treated patients (89.7% [61 of 68 patients] and 90.3% [149 of 165 patients], respectively). Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were similar. Conclusions. Ceftobiprole monotherapy is as effective as vancomycin plus ceftazidime for treating patients with a broad range of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and infections due to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 655
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ceftobiprole medocaril for skin and skin-structure infections
    Mccarthy, Matthew W.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2025,
  • [3] Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET)
    Overcash, J. Scott
    Kim, Charles
    Keech, Richard
    Gumenchuk, Illia
    Ninov, Borislav
    Gonzalez-Rojas, Yaneicy
    Waters, Michael
    Simeonov, Simeon
    Engelhardt, Marc
    Saulay, Mikael
    Ionescu, Daniel
    Smart, Jennifer, I
    Jones, Mark E.
    Hamed, Kamal A.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (07) : E1507 - E1517
  • [4] Results of a double-blind, randomized trial of ceftobiprole treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria
    Noel, Gary J.
    Strauss, Richard S.
    Amsler, Karen
    Heep, Markus
    Pypstra, Rienk
    Solomkin, Joseph S.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 52 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [5] Ceftobiprole medocaril (BAL-5788) for the treatment of complicated skin infections
    Deitchman, Amelia N.
    de Jong, Daniel
    Barbour, April M.
    Derendorf, Hartmut
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2016, 14 (11) : 997 - 1006
  • [6] RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF CEFONICID AND NAFCILLIN IN THE TREATMENT OF SKIN AND SKIN STRUCTURE INFECTIONS
    DALY, JS
    WORTHINGTON, MG
    ANDREWS, RJ
    BROWN, RB
    SCHWARTZ, R
    SEXTON, DJ
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 34 (04) : 654 - 656
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial
    Sacchidanand, S
    Penn, RL
    Embil, JM
    Campos, ME
    Curcio, D
    Ellis-Grosse, E
    Loh, E
    Rose, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 9 (05) : 251 - 261
  • [8] Pharmacology and the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections
    Chambers, Henry F.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (23): : 2238 - 2239
  • [9] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED NONINFERIORITY TRIAL COMPARING DAPTOMYCIN TO VANCOMYCIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED SKIN AND SKIN STRUCTURE INFECTIONS IN AN OBSERVATION UNIT
    Shaw, George J.
    Meunier, Jason M.
    Korfhagen, Joseph
    Wayne, Beth
    Hart, Kimberly
    Lindsell, Christopher J.
    Fermann, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (06): : 928 - 936
  • [10] TREATMENT OF HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS WITH COMPLICATED SKIN AND SKIN-STRUCTURE INFECTIONS - DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM VERSUS TICARCILLIN-CLAVULANATE
    TAN, JS
    WISHNOW, RM
    TALAN, DA
    DUNCANSON, FP
    NORDEN, CW
    HANNA, C
    CHRISTOU, N
    BERNSTEIN, J
    MARSH, P
    SMITH, M
    SAPICO, F
    MURRAY, G
    CROCKERSMITH, LL
    SEGRETI, J
    GENTRY, L
    CULLISON, J
    SATHE, S
    LOW, I
    LAMOTHE, F
    MERSEY, J
    DALL, L
    LAVERDIERE, M
    MITCHELL, J
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (08) : 1580 - 1586