RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED NONINFERIORITY TRIAL COMPARING DAPTOMYCIN TO VANCOMYCIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED SKIN AND SKIN STRUCTURE INFECTIONS IN AN OBSERVATION UNIT

被引:13
|
作者
Shaw, George J. [1 ,2 ]
Meunier, Jason M. [1 ]
Korfhagen, Joseph [1 ]
Wayne, Beth [1 ]
Hart, Kimberly [1 ]
Lindsell, Christopher J. [1 ]
Fermann, Gregory [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Emergency Med, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Biomed Engn Program, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2015年 / 49卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cellulitis; daptomycin; vancomycin; ED observation unit; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS; PREVALENCE; CELLULITIS; INPATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing in complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) presenting to emergency departments (EDs). Treatment is heterogeneous and can require inpatient admission to an observation unit (OU). Vancomycin is commonly used in the OU for treatment, but increasing MRSA resistance to vancomycin suggests the need for alternatives. Daptomycin is an alternative but it is not known how it compares with vancomycin. Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that daptomycin is noninferior to vancomycin for the treatment of cSSSI in an OU, using a relative risk (RR) of 1.3 as the noninferiority limit. Methods: Subjects admitted to an ED-based OU with a diagnosis of cSSSI were eligible. Consenting subjects were randomized 1: 1 to intravenous (i.v.) vancomycin at 15 mg/kg dosing every 12 h or i.v. daptomycin at 4 mg/kg once. Subjects were followed until they met objective criteria for discharge home or hospital admission. Discharged patients were prescribed 10-14 days of oral cephalexin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or clindamycin if allergic to either of these medications. The primary endpoint was meeting objective discharge criteria with no change in antibiotic therapy or return to the ED for the same cellulitis within 30 days of OU discharge. Results: There were 100 patients enrolled. RR for satisfying the endpoint was 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.58-1.98) for daptomycin compared with vancomycin. Hospital admission rates were 36% and 32% for daptomycin and vancomycin treatment, respectively. Conclusion: Daptomycin was not inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of cSSSI in an OU. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:928 / 936
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Daptomycin for Complicated Skin Infections: A Randomized Trial
    Bradley, John
    Glasser, Chad
    Patino, Hernando
    Arnold, Sandra R.
    Arrieta, Antonio
    Congeni, Blaise
    Daum, Robert S.
    Kojaoghlanian, Tsoline
    Yoon, Minjung
    Anastasiou, Diane
    Wolf, Dominik J.
    Bokesch, Paula
    PEDIATRICS, 2017, 139 (03)
  • [2] Daptomycin for treating infected diabetic foot ulcers: evidence from a randomized, controlled trial comparing daptomycin with vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins for complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Lipsky, BA
    Stoutenburgh, U
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 55 (02) : 240 - 245
  • [3] Daptomycin versus vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections: Clinical and economic outcomes
    Davis, Susan L.
    McKinnon, Peggy S.
    Hall, Levi M.
    Delgado, George, Jr.
    Rose, Warren
    Wilson, Robert E.
    Rybak, MichaelJ.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 27 (12): : 1611 - 1618
  • [4] An open-label, pragmatic, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection
    Kauf, Teresa L.
    McKinnon, Peggy
    Corey, G. Ralph
    Bedolla, John
    Riska, Paul F.
    Sims, Matthew
    Jauregui-Peredo, Luis
    Friedman, Bruce
    Hoehns, James D.
    Mercier, Renee-Claude
    Garcia-Diaz, Julia
    Brenneman, Susan K.
    Ng, David
    Lodise, Thomas
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 15
  • [5] An open-label, pragmatic, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection
    Teresa L. Kauf
    Peggy McKinnon
    G. Ralph Corey
    John Bedolla
    Paul F. Riska
    Matthew Sims
    Luis Jauregui-Peredo
    Bruce Friedman
    James D. Hoehns
    Renée-Claude Mercier
    Julia Garcia-Diaz
    Susan K. Brenneman
    David Ng
    Thomas Lodise
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 15
  • [6] A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Noel, Gary J.
    Bush, Karen
    Bagchi, Partha
    Ianus, Juliana
    Strauss, Richard S.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (05) : 647 - 655
  • [7] The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections
    Arbeit, RD
    Maki, D
    Tally, FP
    Campanaro, E
    Eisenstein, BI
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) : 1673 - 1681
  • [8] TD-1792 versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
    Stryjewski, Martin E.
    Potgieter, Peter D.
    Li, Yu-Ping
    Barriere, Steven L.
    Churukian, Allan
    Kingsley, Jeff
    Corey, G. Ralph
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (11) : 5476 - 5483
  • [10] Linezolid vs vancomycin in children with complicated skin/skin structure infections
    Yogev, R
    Edge-Padbury, B
    Naberhuis-Stehouwer, S
    Bruss, JB
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 322A - 322A