Risk assessment of equity-based conventional and islamic stock portfolios

被引:3
|
作者
Hasnie, Syed Sharjeel Ahmad [1 ]
Collazzo, Pablo [2 ]
Hassan, M. Kabir [3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Finance IBA, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] FHW Vienna Univ Appl Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ New Orleans, Dept Finance, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
关键词
Islamic finance; Diversification; EGARCH-M; Risk premia; Efficiency; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; DEPOSIT INSURANCE; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; BANKS; FINANCE; COST; EQUILIBRIUM; ECONOMICS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2022.04.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study attempts to explore and compare the risk-return relationship and risk premia of the two parallel financial systems in Pakistan, i.e. Islamic (Sharia-compliant) and Conventional (non- Islamic) using two different asset pricing models, namely CAPM and Fama and French (FF) three-factor model. After initial classification, both systems have been split into four subcategories. So conventional stocks portfolios of banks, insurance companies, investment banks, and mutual funds have been compared with Islamic banks, leasing, Modarabah, and Islamic mutual funds stocks in terms of return, risk, and conditional volatility. These results depict significant variations in returns and/or risks (unconditional variance) between these comparable financial systems. The risk premia of conventional stocks are considerably higher than their Islamic compeers. The hypothesis of efficient risk-return relationship is supported for all portfolios, but the relationship is much stronger for the Islamic stocks as compared to the conventional ones. Moreover, the lower reward of Islamic stocks is associated with lesser conditional volatility. The nonsynchronous effect and persistence in the volatility of returns are apparent in all stocks except Modarabah and Islamic mutual funds. Further, the impact of volatility clustering on returns of all stock portfolios is quite larger than external shock. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 378
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stock returns in Islamic and conventional banks
    Monia, Ben Ltaifa
    JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (03) : 629 - 646
  • [32] A Simplified Framework for the Equity-Based Spatial Assessment of Alternative Public Transport Networks
    Giuffrida, Nadia
    Binetti, Mario
    Viscio, Salvatore
    Ottomanelli, Michele
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [33] Risk spillovers in international equity portfolios
    Bonato, Matteo
    Caporin, Massimiliano
    Ranaldo, Angelo
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2013, 24 : 121 - 137
  • [34] Effects of Two Equity-Based Incentives for Risk Averse Managers: A Comparative Study
    Yang, Huihui
    Cheng, Anlin
    Zhang, Xiaolan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & SYSTEM DYNAMICS, VOL 8, 2009, : 121 - 125
  • [35] Dynamic dependence of the global Islamic equity index with global conventional equity market indices and risk factors
    Hammoudeh, Shawkat
    Mensi, Walid
    Carlos Reboredo, Juan
    Duc Khuong Nguyen
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2014, 30 : 189 - 206
  • [36] Equity-based Compensation and Manager's Risk-taking in Commercial Banks
    Shao, Ke
    PROCEEDINGS OF CHINA-CANADA INDUSTRY WORKSHOP ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT 2008, 2008, : 395 - 403
  • [37] Equity-Based Incentives, Risk Aversion, and Merger-Related Risk-Taking Behavior
    Benson, Bradley
    Park, Jung
    Davidson, Wallace, III
    FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2014, 49 (01) : 117 - 148
  • [38] Resistance to system development: An equity-based model
    Essex, PA
    ADVANCES IN ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL 5 - 1997, 1997, 5 : 167 - 204
  • [39] An equity-based transport network criticality analysis
    Jafino, Bramka Arga
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 144 : 204 - 221
  • [40] Predictability dynamics of Islamic and conventional equity markets
    Sensoy, Ahmet
    Aras, Guler
    Hacihasanoglu, Erk
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2015, 31 : 222 - 248