Determinants of Accounts Level and Entity Level Key Audit Matters: Further Evidence

被引:18
|
作者
BEPARI, M. D. K. H. O. K. A. N. [1 ]
MOLLIK, A. B. U. T. A. H. E. R. [2 ]
NAHAR, S. H. A. M. S. U. N. [3 ]
ISLAM, M. O. H. A. M. M. A. D. N. A. Z. R. U. L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Holmes Inst, Higher Educ Div, Level 1,171 Elizabeth St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Canberra Business Sch, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Griffith Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ New Mexico, Anderson Sch Management, Dept Accounting, Albuquerque, NM USA
关键词
key audit matters; account-level key audit matters; entity-level key audit matters; firm characteristics; audit characteristics; auditor characteristics; INDUSTRY EXPERTISE; OFFICE-LEVEL; QUALITY; GENDER; FIRM; RISK; FEES; CONVERSATION; COMPLEXITY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/17449480.2022.2060753
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine firm-specific factors (firm life cycle, firm size, complexity, litigation risks, intangible intensity), audit-specific factors (audit firm, audit fee, non-audit fee) and auditor-specific factors (auditor's experience, specialization, gender and accounting degree), as determinants of the number of KAMs, account-level KAMs (ALKAMs), and entity-level KAMs (ELKAMs) for a sample of Australian firms. Our findings suggest that KAMs' disclosure varies based on client firm-specific characteristics, audit firm-specific characteristics and audit partners' characteristics. We find that firms' life cycle, size, complexity, intangible intensity, audit firm identity, audit fees, auditors' specialization, experience, gender and accounting degree affect the number and types of KAMs' disclosure. Our findings negate the concern of stereotyping in KAMs disclosures and suggest that KAMs' disclosure varies based on many contextual factors. Our findings have important implications for audit firms, corporate boards, investors and regulators.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 422
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong
    Espahbodi, Reza
    Lin, Jiarong
    Liu, Nan
    Mock, Theodore J.
    Song, Mohan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2023, 22 (02) : 83 - 102
  • [32] Does client importance affect key audit matters reporting? New Zealand evidence
    Ji, Ruoyu
    Li, Lina Zixuan
    Li, Leonard Leye
    Monroe, Gary S.
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2024, 36 (3/4) : 277 - 296
  • [33] Disclosure of Key Audit Matters: European Listed Companies' Evidence on Related Parties Transactions
    Pasc, Lioara-Veronica
    Hategan, Camelia-Daniela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2023, 11 (03):
  • [34] Disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) in financial reporting: evidence from an emerging economy
    Rahaman, Md Mustafizur
    Hossain, Md Moazzem
    Bhuiyan, Md Borhan Uddin
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2023, 13 (03) : 666 - 702
  • [35] The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China
    Ma, Qianqun
    Zhou, Jianan
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Kongwen
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 93
  • [36] Do Key Audit Matters Affect Operating Activities? Evidence from Inventory Management
    An, Ran
    Li, Wentao
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Yanyan
    Yu, Lisheng
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 59 (01): : 300 - 339
  • [37] FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR THE INDEPENDENCE OF HEDONIC LEVEL AND EMOTIONAL INTENSITY
    THAYER, JF
    MILLER, ML
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1988, 9 (02) : 425 - 426
  • [38] QUALIFICATIONAL LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES AS THE KEY FACTOR IN INCREASING THE QUALITY OF AUDIT SERVICES
    Tusibaeva, G. S.
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2012, (131): : 449 - 456
  • [39] Aggregation level matters: evidence from french electoral data
    Luana Russo
    Laurent Beauguitte
    Quality & Quantity, 2014, 48 : 923 - 938
  • [40] Aggregation level matters: evidence from french electoral data
    Russo, Luana
    Beauguitte, Laurent
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (02) : 923 - 938