Social Coordination in Human-Robot Interaction Through Reciprocal Engagement

被引:1
|
作者
Marti, Patrizia [1 ,2 ]
Iacono, Iolanda [1 ]
Parlangeli, Oronzo [1 ]
Stienstra, Jelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-13-9652-6_25
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, we provide a theoretical and experimental investigation on human-robot interaction scenarios where collaborative activities are perceived more meaningful and easier to perform by the human agent in the situation of reciprocal engagement with the robot. Inspired by the perceptual-crossing paradigm (Auvray and Rohde in Front Hum Neurosci, [1]), we defined reciprocal engagement as an interaction concept that seeks to extend perceptual crossing to functional purposes. For instance, when a robot and a person face a door and they both intend to go through it, a designed behaviour negotiates who is to go first in appropriate manner, either the human or the robot. The objective of the study is to explore social coordination mechanisms that are easy and natural for the human agent in order to engage in interaction with a robot. Two experiments were conducted which explore interaction scenarios with and without reciprocal engagement between a person and a robot to appreciate their significance for the human actor. In the first one, interaction scenarios are evaluated on the basis on video clips; in the second one, participants were asked to interact directly with the robot according to the same scenarios. The results show a preference of participants towards reciprocal engagement situations which were considered more meaningful and easier to learn. With this work, we hope to inspire design thinking to shift from discrete, procedural design mechanisms to continuous and action-driven mechanisms of social coordinationwhen addressing the interaction between humans and systems in smart environments.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 285
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimating Levels of Engagement for Social Human-Robot Interaction using Legendre Memory Units
    Bartlett, Madeleine E.
    Stewart, Terrence C.
    Thill, Serge
    HRI '21: COMPANION OF THE 2021 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2021, : 362 - 366
  • [22] Human-robot coordination
    Glorennec, PY
    Wolinski, K
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS 1997 - KES '97, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 667 - 671
  • [23] Social informatics approach to human-robot interaction with a service social robot
    Lisetti, CL
    Brown, SM
    Alvarez, K
    Marpaung, AH
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2004, 34 (02): : 195 - 209
  • [24] A Study on Social Exclusion in Human-Robot Interaction
    Spisak, Sharon Ewa
    Indurkhya, Bipin
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [25] Movement coordination in applied human-human and human-robot interaction
    Schuboe, Anna
    Vesper, Cordula
    Wiesbeck, Mathey
    Stork, Sonja
    HCI AND USABILITY FOR MEDICINE AND HEALTH CARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4799 : 143 - +
  • [26] Gesture Mimicry in Social Human-Robot Interaction
    Stolzenwald, Janis
    Bremner, Paul
    2017 26TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2017, : 430 - 436
  • [27] Social Human-Robot Interaction for Gait Rehabilitation
    Cespedes, Nathalia
    Munera, Marcela
    Gomez, Catalina
    Cifuentes, Carlos A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2020, 28 (06) : 1299 - 1307
  • [28] Analyzing social situations for human-robot interaction
    Wagner, Alan R.
    Arkin, Ronald C.
    INTERACTION STUDIES, 2008, 9 (02) : 277 - 300
  • [29] A Theory of Social Agency for Human-Robot Interaction
    Jackson, Ryan Blake
    Williams, Tom
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2021, 8
  • [30] Cognitive Architectures for Social Human-Robot Interaction
    Baxter, Paul
    Lemaignan, Severin
    Trafton, J. Gregory
    ELEVENTH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'16), 2016, : 579 - 580