Fractal characterization of hyperspectral imagery

被引:1
|
作者
Qiu, HL [1 ]
Lam, NSN
Quattrochi, DA
Gamon, JA
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Geog & Urban Anal, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Geog & Anthropol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] NASA, Global Hydrol & Climate Ctr, George C Marshall Space Flight Ctr, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA
[4] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Biol & Microbiol, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
来源
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING | 1999年 / 65卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Two AVIRIS hyperspectral images selected from the Los Angeles area, one representing urban and the other rural, were used to examine their spatial complexity across their entire spectrum of the remote sensing data. Using the ICAMS (Image Characterization And Modeling System) software, we computed the fractal dimension values using the isarithm and triangular prism methods for all 224 bands in the two AVIRIS scenes. The resultant fractal dimensions reflect changes in image complexity across the spectral range of the hyperspectral images. Both the isarithm and triangular prism methods detect unusually high D values on the spectral bands that fall within the atmospheric absorption and scattering zones where signal-to-noise ratios are low. Fractal dimensions for the urban area resulted in higher values than for the rural landscape, and the differences between the resulting D values are more distinct in the visible bands. The triangular prism method is sensitive to a few random speckles in the images, leading to a lower dimensionality. On the contrary the isarithm method will ignore the speckles and focus on the major variation dominating the surface, thus resulting in a higher dimension. It is seen where the fractal curves plotted for the entire bandwidth range of the hyperspectral images could be used to distinguish landscape types as well as for screening noisy bands.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterization of anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery
    Chang, Chein-I
    Hsueh, Mingkai
    Sensor Review, 2006, 26 (02) : 137 - 146
  • [2] Fractal characterization. of IKONOS imagery
    Zhang, HG
    Huang, WG
    Zhou, CB
    MULTISPECTRAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING INSTRUMENTS AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 4897 : 292 - 301
  • [3] Clutter characterization within segmented hyperspectral imagery
    Kacenjar, Steve T.
    Hoffberg, Michael
    North, Patrick
    IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING XIII, 2007, 6748
  • [4] Hyperspectral imagery for characterization of different corn genotypes
    Yao, HB
    Hruska, Z
    DiCrispino, K
    Lewis, D
    Beach, J
    Brown, RL
    Cleveland, TE
    NONDESTRUCTIVE SENSING FOR FOOD SAFETY, QUALITY, AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 2004, 5587 : 144 - 152
  • [5] Radiative modeling and characterization of aerosol plumes in hyperspectral imagery
    Alakian, Alexandre
    Marion, Rodolphe
    Briottet, Xavier
    IGARSS: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-12: SENSING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR PLANET, 2007, : 3219 - +
  • [6] Analysis of an autonomous clutter background characterization method for hyperspectral imagery
    Romano, Joao M.
    Rosari, Dalton
    Roth, Luz
    Roese, Eric
    Willson, Paul
    ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XIV, 2008, 6966
  • [7] LWIR hyperspectral imagery and its exploitation for gas plume characterization
    Shepanski, J
    Sandor-Leahy, S
    IGARSS 2005: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vols 1-8, Proceedings, 2005, : 4958 - 4961
  • [8] Detection in hyperspectral imagery
    Schweizer, SM
    Moura, JMF
    ALGORITHMS FOR MULTISPECTRAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY IV, 1998, 3372 : 188 - 198
  • [9] Hyperspectral imagery and segmentation
    Wellman, M
    Nasrabadi, N
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XII, 2002, 4726 : 149 - 161
  • [10] Hyperspectral Imagery Superresolution
    Irmak, Hasan
    Akar, Gozde Bozdagi
    Yuksel, Seniha Esen
    2016 24TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION APPLICATION CONFERENCE (SIU), 2016, : 1057 - 1060