Quantitative analysis of the content of nitrogen and sulfur in coal based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: effects of variable selection

被引:23
|
作者
Deng, Fan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ding, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Yujuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Shaonong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Key Lab Big Data Anal Technol, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Atmospher Environm, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Engn Res Ctr Meteorol Energy Using & Cont, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
关键词
variable selection; LIBS; coal; CARS and SPA; LIBS; POLLUTION; ELEMENTS; IMPACTS; MACHINE; BIOMASS; SAMPLES; CARBON; SOIL; ASH;
D O I
10.1088/2058-6272/ab77d5
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Coal is a crucial fossil energy in today's society, and the detection of sulfur (S) and nitrogen (N) in coal is essential for the evaluation of coal quality. Therefore, an efficient method is needed to quantitatively analyze N and S content in coal, to achieve the purpose of clean utilization of coal. This study applied laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) to test coal quality, and combined two variable selection algorithms, competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) and the successive projections algorithm (SPA), to establish the corresponding partial least square (PLS) model. The results of the experiment were as follows. The PLS modeled with the full spectrum of 27,620 variables has poor accuracy, the coefficient of determination of the test set ((RP)-P-2) and root mean square error of the test set (RMSEP) of nitrogen were 0.5172 and 0.2263, respectively, and those of sulfur were 0.5784 and 0.5811, respectively. The CARS-PLS screened 37 and 25 variables respectively in the detection of N and S elements, but the prediction ability of the model did not improve significantly. SPA-PLS finally screened 14 and 11 variables respectively through successive projections, and obtained the best prediction effect among the three methods. The (RP)-P-2 and RMSEP of nitrogen were 0.9873 and 0.0208, respectively, and those of sulfur were 0.9451 and 0.2082, respectively. In general, the predictive results of the two elements increased by about 90% for RMSEP and 60% for (RP)-P-2 compared with PLS. The results show that LIBS combined with SPA-PLS has good potential for detecting N and S content in coal, and is a very promising technology for industrial application.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of experimental parameters on elemental analysis of coal by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Li, Jie
    Lu, Jidong
    Lin, Zhaoxiang
    Gong, Shunsheng
    Xie, Chengli
    Chang, Liang
    Yang, Lifei
    Li, Pengyan
    OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 41 (08): : 907 - 913
  • [22] Quantitative analysis of nitrogen in ammonium phosphate fertilizers using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Zhang, Baohua
    Sha, Wen
    Jiang, Yongcheng
    Cui, Zhifeng
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2019, 58 (12) : 3277 - 3281
  • [23] A novel hybrid feature selection strategy in quantitative analysis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Yan, Chunhua
    Liang, Jing
    Zhao, Mingjing
    Zhang, Xin
    Zhang, Tianlong
    Li, Hua
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 1080 : 35 - 42
  • [24] Comparative Study of Four Chemometric Methods for the Quantitative Analysis of the Carbon Content in Coal by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Technology
    Ni, Qi
    Zhu, Yanqun
    Zhu, Wenyu
    He, Yong
    Wan, Zhihua
    ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (11): : 9443 - 9451
  • [25] Coal analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: a tutorial review
    Sheta, Sahar
    Afgan, Muhammad Sher
    Hou, Zongyu
    Yao, Shun-Chun
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Zheng
    Wang, Zhe
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2019, 34 (06) : 1047 - 1082
  • [26] Rapid quantitative analysis of petroleum coke properties by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with random forest based on a variable selection strategy
    Hu, Shunfan
    Ding, Jianming
    Dong, Yan
    Zhang, Tianlong
    Tang, Hongsheng
    Li, Hua
    RSC ADVANCES, 2024, 14 (23) : 16358 - 16367
  • [27] Coal property analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Yuan, Tingbi
    Wang, Zhe
    Lui, Siu-Lung
    Fu, Yangting
    Li, Zheng
    Liu, Jianming
    Ni, Weidou
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2013, 28 (07) : 1045 - 1053
  • [28] Variables selection: A critical issue for quantitative laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Guezenoc, Julian
    Bassel, Lena
    Gallet-Budynek, Anne
    Bousquet, Bruno
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2017, 134 : 6 - 10
  • [29] Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Online Quantitative Analysis for Laser Processing
    Zhao, Tianzhuo
    Zhong, Qixiu
    Nie, Shuzhen
    Liu, Xiaolong
    Xiao, Hong
    Yin, Chenxuan
    Zhong, Fanghui
    Ke, Yachen
    Li, Fei
    ADVANCED PHOTONICS RESEARCH, 2024, 5 (07):
  • [30] An echellograms-based quantitative analysis method of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Yue, Zengqi
    Sun, Chen
    Zhang, Yuqing
    Xu, Weijie
    Chen, Fengye
    Zhang, Beiyi
    Sun, Tianyang
    Rao, Yunfei
    Duan, Chenyang
    Yu, Jin
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2024, 218