Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy

被引:13
|
作者
Ziayee, F. [1 ]
Mueller-Lutz, A. [1 ]
Gross, J. [1 ]
Quentin, M. [1 ]
Ullrich, T. [1 ]
Heusch, P. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Rabenalt, R. [2 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Wittsack, H. J. [1 ]
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Arterial input function; Quantitative perfusion parameters; Tofts model; Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Prostate MRI; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; CANCER-DETECTION; PI-RADS; LOCALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; SEQUENCES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Reproducibility of quantitative perfusion analysis of DCE requires a standardized AIF acquisition. However, there are many different approaches for AIF assessment so that the absolute values of perfusion parameters may vary depending on the used method. This study analyzes the influence of the method of AIF determination on quantitative DCE-MRI. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study three different methods of AIF determination in 50 consecutive patients with multiparametric MRI of the prostate were conducted. As a reference, AIF was selected manually by defining a region of interest in an artery manually (AIF(m)). The second method (AIF(a)), based on an automated algorithm and the third, population-derived AlFp where then compared. Primary endpoint were differences in the performance of the perfusion parameters K-trans, ve and k(ep) regarding the AIF acquisition methods, secondary endpoints consisted of the evaluation of differences in the peripheral and transition zone of the prostate (PZ, TZ). Results: In all three methods, K-trans, ve, and k(ep) were significantly higher in PZ than in TZ with K-trans showing least overlapping. There were no significant differences for K-trans determined with AIF(m), and AIF(a) (0.3 +/- 0.2 min(-1) for PZ for both and 0.5 +/- 0.3 min(-1) for TZ in AIF(m) and 0.4 +/- 0.3 min(-1) in AIF(a)), while there were great differences between AIF(a) and AIF(p) and AIF(m) and AIF(p) (0.1 +/- 0.03 min(-1) for TZ and PZ in AIF(p)). Spearman test demonstrated good correlation of values for K-trans and K-ep in all 3 methods (p >= 0.76). AIF(a) showed a success rate of 98% in finding the artery. Conclusion: AIF(a) is a recommendable user-independent automatical method to determine quantitative perfusion parameters allowing an objective measurement and saving interactive time for the radiologist. AIF(p) may be applied as second alternative method.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
    Mehrabian, Hatef
    Chandrana, Chaitanya
    Pang, Ian
    Chopra, Rajiv
    Martel, Anne L.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (08) : 1735 - 1747
  • [42] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: Is this the way to proceed for characterization of prostatic carcinoma?
    R. H. Oyen
    European Radiology, 2003, 13 : 921 - 924
  • [43] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Hobbs, Brian Paul
    Wei, Wei
    Kundra, Vikas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (04) : W439 - W448
  • [44] Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria:: is it reasonable?
    Girouin, Nicolas
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Senes, Alejandro Tonina
    Bissery, Alvine
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Marechal, Jean-Marie
    Colombel, Marc
    Lyonnet, Denis
    Rouviere, Olivier
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (06) : 1498 - 1509
  • [45] Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable?
    Nicolas Girouin
    Florence Mège-Lechevallier
    Alejandro Tonina Senes
    Alvine Bissery
    Muriel Rabilloud
    Jean-Marie Maréchal
    Marc Colombel
    Denis Lyonnet
    Olivier Rouvière
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1498 - 1509
  • [46] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: Is this the way to proceed for characterization of prostatic carcinoma?
    Oyen, RH
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) : 921 - 924
  • [47] Automatic selection of arterial input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images
    Peruzzo, Denis
    Bertoldo, Alessandra
    Zanderigo, Francesca
    Cobelli, Claudio
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 104 (03) : E148 - E157
  • [48] Differentiation of prostate cancer from normal prostate tissue in an animal model:: Conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Gemeinhardt, O
    Lüdemann, L
    Prochnow, D
    Abramjuk, C
    Taupitz, M
    Hamm, B
    Beyersdorff, D
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2005, 177 (07): : 935 - 939
  • [49] Therapy monitoring of Sorafenib effect on experimental prostate carcinomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI with Gadobutrol and immunohistochemical analyses
    Cyran, C. C.
    Paprottka, P. M.
    Schwarz, B.
    Bruns, C. J.
    Dietrich, O.
    Hinkel, R.
    Von Einem, J.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Nikolaou, K.
    Wintersperger, B. J.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (07): : 151 - 151
  • [50] Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prostate cancer
    Alonzi, Roberto
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Allen, Clare
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 63 (03) : 335 - 350