Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer

被引:13
|
作者
Kuo, Li-Jen [1 ,2 ]
Ngu, James Chi-Yong [3 ]
Huang, Yan-Jiun [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Yen-Kuang [6 ]
Chen, Chia-Che [7 ]
Tong, Yiu-Shun [7 ]
Huang, Szu-Chia [8 ]
Hu, Chia-Chen [1 ]
Tan, Shu-Hwa [9 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Div Colorectal Surg, Dept Surg, 252 Wuxing St, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med Sci & Technol, PhD Program Translat Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Acad Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Med Univ, Biostat & Res Consultat Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg & Traumatol, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[9] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Anal stenosis; Intersphincteric resection; Mucosal prolapse; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery; MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; DISTAL MARGIN; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-017-5499-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Robotic intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been introduced for sphincter-preservation in the treatment of low rectal cancer. However, many patients experience anorectal symptoms and defecatory dysfunction after ISR. This study aims to evaluate the anorectal complications that develop after ISR. Methods The medical records of 108 patients who underwent robotic ISR at Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan between December 2011 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Photographic records of perineal conditions were documented at the following time intervals after surgery: 1 day, 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. Clinical outcomes and treatment results were analysed. Results Eighty-five patients (78.7%) developed edematous hemorrhoids after surgery. These subsided at a median of 56 days after operation (range 23-89 days). Forty-six patients (42.6%) were found to have anal stenosis requiring anal dilatation. Sixteen patients (14.8%) had neorectal mucosal prolapse, which was noted to occur at an average of 98 days after surgery (range 41-162 days). Multivariate analysis showed that the occurrence of edematous hemorrhoids was associated with operating time (P = 0.043), and male gender was a significant risk factor for anal stenosis (P = 0.007). Conclusions This is the first study reporting on the clinical outcomes of anorectal status after robotic ISR. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term effects of these anorectal complications.
引用
收藏
页码:4466 / 4471
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: Systemic review and meta-analysis
    Lim, S. W.
    Ju, J. I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [42] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of the Operative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Byung-Eun Yoo
    Jae-Sung Cho
    Jae-Won Shin
    Dong-Won Lee
    Jung-Myun Kwak
    Jin Kim
    Seon-Hahn Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 1219 - 1225
  • [43] Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer - a video vignette
    Sahebally, S. M.
    McKevitt, K.
    El-Masry, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (07) : 646 - 646
  • [44] Robotic Coloanal Anastomosis with or without Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Starting with the Perianal Approach Followed by Robotic Procedure
    Kang, Jeonghyun
    Hur, Hyuk
    Min, Byung Soh
    Lee, Kang Young
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 154 - 155
  • [45] Oncologic Outcome of Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer
    Saito, Norio
    Sugito, Masanori
    Ito, Masaaki
    Kobayashi, Akihiro
    Nishizawa, Yusuke
    Yoneyama, Yasuo
    Nishizawa, Yuji
    Minagawa, Nozomi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (08) : 1750 - 1756
  • [46] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of the Operative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Yoo, Byung-Eun
    Cho, Jae-Sung
    Shin, Jae-Won
    Lee, Dong-Won
    Kwak, Jung-Myun
    Kim, Jin
    Kim, Seon-Hahn
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : 1219 - 1225
  • [47] Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer
    Li, F.
    Zhang, F.
    Tan, D.
    Ye, J.
    Tong, W.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (12) : 1335 - 1336
  • [48] Oncologic Outcome of Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer
    Norio Saito
    Masanori Sugito
    Masaaki Ito
    Akihiro Kobayashi
    Yusuke Nishizawa
    Yasuo Yoneyama
    Yuji Nishizawa
    Nozomi Minagawa
    World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33 : 1750 - 1756
  • [49] Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lim, Sang Woo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (12) : 1741 - 1753
  • [50] Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer
    F. Li
    F. Zhang
    D. Tan
    J. Ye
    W. Tong
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2021, 25 : 1335 - 1336