Characteristics of Integrated Care Programmes and their Impact on Patient Benefit: A Discrete-Choice Experiment for Integrated Care Networks

被引:3
|
作者
Muehlbacher, A. C. [1 ]
Bethge, S. [1 ]
Eble, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hsch Neubrandenburg, Inst Gesundheitsokon & Med Management, D-17041 Neubrandenburg, Germany
[2] Berlin Chem AG, Leitung Gesundheitsmanagement, Berlin, Germany
关键词
patient preferences; discrete-choice experiment; integrated care; healthcare network; HEALTH-CARE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PREFERENCES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1372615
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: Innovative care models shall reduce the frictional losses in health-care. The successful implementation of care networks requires the acceptance by the health care providers, by the patients and citizens as well as by the payers. The consideration of preferences is an essential factor for success. The aim of this study is to analyse patient preferences. Methods: With the help of Discrete-Choice experiment 21 patient-relevant attributes of innovative healthcare programmes were examined. On the basis of a balanced overlapping design (sawtooth) a total of 140 choice sets with the highest possible D efficiency was generated. The 21 attributes were divided into 4 thematic priorities for analysis. The cost attribute was integrated as a uniform comparator. The evaluation was done by a random effects logit estimation (STATA). Results: The representative samples (N=1322) revealed that in all 4 DCE blocks the attribute additional costs had the strongest influence on the patients choice (1: coeff.; 1.047; 2: coeff.: 1.105; 3.: coeff.: 0.956; 4.: coeff.: 0.954). This was followed by medical apparatus and facilities, waiting time for an appointment, professional experience, travelling time to treatment site, and exchange of clinical information. Transfer management and consideration of individual circumstances for example, had a small influence on patient choice. Conclusion: In order to increase the acceptance of innovative health-care programmes preferences must be known and integrated into the design of the services. The present study has attempted to depict the patients' perspectives towards the new care systems. The individual selection decisions were not, as would be expected, influenced by the innovative approaches such as case management or shared decision making but rather by the quality of the infrastructure, the waiting times and professional experience.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 350
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Preferences for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Li, Daneng
    Tan, Ruoding
    Hernandez, Sairy
    Reilly, Norelle
    Bussberg, Cooper
    Mansfield, Carol
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [22] Patient preferences for chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments: a discrete-choice experiment
    Ravelo, Arliene
    Myers, Kelley
    Brumble, Robyn
    Bussberg, Cooper
    Koffman, Brian
    Manzoor, Beenish S.
    Biondo, Juliana M.
    Mansfield, Carol
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (28) : 2059 - 2070
  • [23] Patient Preferences for Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Augustovski, Federico
    Beratarrechea, Andrea
    Irazola, Vilma
    Rubinstein, Fernando
    Tesolin, Pablo
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Lencina, Veronica
    Scolnik, Marina
    Waimann, Christian
    Navarta, David
    Citera, Gustavo
    Soriano, Enrique R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (02) : 385 - 393
  • [24] Impact of clinical and demographic characteristics on patient preferences for psoriasis treatment features: Results from a discrete-choice experiment in a multicountry study
    Boeri, Marco
    Saure, Daniel
    Schuster, Christopher
    Hill, Julie
    Guerreiro, Mariana
    Klein, Kathleen
    Hauber, Brett
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2022, 33 (03) : 1598 - 1605
  • [25] Variation in Integrated Head and Neck Cancer Care: Impact of Patient and Hospital Characteristics
    van Overveld, Lydia F. J.
    Takes, Robert P.
    Braspenning, Joze C. C.
    de Jong, Robert J. Baatenburg
    de Boer, Jan P.
    Brouns, John J. A.
    Bun, Rolf J.
    Dik, Eric A.
    van Dijk, Boukje A. C.
    van Es, Robert J. J.
    Hoebers, Frank J. P.
    Kolenaar, Barry
    Kropveld, Arvid
    Langeveld, Ton P. M.
    Verschuur, Hendrik P.
    de Visscher, Jan G. A. M.
    van Weert, Stijn
    Witjes, Max J. H.
    Smeele, Ludi E.
    Merkx, Matthias A. W.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (12): : 1491 - 1498
  • [26] Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability
    Sheena Arora
    Stephen Goodall
    Rosalie Viney
    Stewart Einfeld
    PharmacoEconomics, 2019, 37 : 501 - 511
  • [27] The Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment Questionnaire to Conduct a Cost Benefit Analysis of a New Integrated Foot Care Programme for Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.
    Hendry, G. J.
    Lorgelly, P. K.
    Sturrock, R. D.
    Turner, D. E.
    Gardner-Medwin, J.
    Woodburn, J.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 54 (04) : 49 - 49
  • [28] Using Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods to Estimate the Value of Informal Care: The Case of Children with Intellectual Disability
    Arora, Sheena
    Goodall, Stephen
    Viney, Rosalie
    Einfeld, Stewart
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (04) : 501 - 511
  • [29] Discrete-choice experiment to measure patient preferences for the surgical management of colorectal cancer
    Salkeld, G
    Solomon, M
    Butow, P
    Short, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (06) : 742 - 747
  • [30] Patients, Partners, Professionals, Payers and Policy Makers Preferences for Integrated Care for Multimorbidity in Germany: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Struckmann, Verena
    Vogt, Verena
    Koeppen, Julia
    Meier, Theresa
    Hoedemakers, Maaike
    Leijten, Fenna
    Looman, Willemijn
    Karimi, Milad
    Busse, Reinhard
    Rutten-van Molken, Maureen
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 84 (12) : 1145 - 1153