Rupatadine 10 mg and cetirizine 10 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis:: A randomised, double-blind parallel study

被引:0
|
作者
Martínez-Cócera, C
De Molina, M
Martí-Guadaño, E
Pola, J
Conde, J
Borja, J
Pérez, I
Arnaiz, E
Izguierdo, I
机构
[1] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Allergol, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Creu Roja, Dept Allergol, Lhospitalet De Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp St Pere Claver, Dept Allergol, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Policlin Sagasta, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
[6] Palau Solita & Plegamans, Barcelona, Spain
[7] J Uriach & Compania SA, Poligon Ind Riera de Caldes, Clin Res & Dev Unit, Barcelona 08184, Spain
关键词
rupatadine; cetirizine; seasonal allergic rhinitis; platelet-activating factor antihistamine drugs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
This randomised double blind, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of rupatadine, a new antihistamine with antiplatelet-activating factor (PAF) activity, and cetirizine in the treatmentof patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). A total 249 patients were randomized to recieve rupatadine 10mg once daily (127 patients) or cetirizine 10mg (122 patients) for two weeks. The main efficacy variable was the mean total daily symptom score (mTDSS) and was based on the daily subjective assessment of the severity of each rhinitis symptom - nasal (runny nose, squeezing, nasal itching and nasal obstruction) and non-nasal (conjunctival itching, tearing, and pharyngeal itching) recorded by patients in their diaries. The mTDSS was 0.7 for both treatment groups (intention to treat analysis). In the investigator's global evaluation of efficacy at the seventh day. 93.3% and 83.7% patients in the rupatadine and cetirizine groups respectively, showed some or great improvement (p = 0.22). In the per protocal analysis (n = 1x1), runny noseat the seventh day of treatment was absent or mild in 81.1% of patients in the rupatadine group and in 68.6% of patients in setirizine group (p = 0.029). In any case statistical significance was not maintained at the second week. Overall, all treatments were well tolerated. Adverse events (AE's) were similar in both treatment groups, i.e. headache, somnolence and fatigue/asthenia as the most often reported. Somnolence was reported in 9.6% and 8.5% of patients treated with rupatadine or cetirizine, respectively. The most reported AE's (67%) were mild in intensity. Our results suggest that rupatadine 10mg may be a valuable and safe alternative for the symptomatic treatment of SAR.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROL STUDY OF LORATADINE (L)5 MG PLUS PSEUDOEPHEDRINE (P)120 MG (SCH434) IN SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS (SAR)
    GROSSMAN, J
    SCHENKEL, EC
    BRONSKY, E
    LINZMAYER, I
    SELNER, J
    LANIER, BQ
    MOSS, BA
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1987, 58 (04): : 280 - 280
  • [32] Rapid and sustained efficacy of mizolastine 10 mg once daily in seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Stern, M
    Blondin-Ertzbischoff, P
    Murrieta-Aguttes, M
    Hardwicke, C
    Emmerson, EBM
    Judd, MS
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 26 (06) : 292 - 303
  • [33] The effect of Theophylline in patients with allergic rhinitis: A double-blind, randomised, crossover study
    Sankaran, Prasanna
    Brockwell, Claire
    Wilson, Andrew
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [34] Randomized Double-Blind Study of Prophylactic Treatment with an Antihistamine for Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
    Yonekura, Syuji
    Okamoto, Yoshitaka
    Yamamoto, Heizaburo
    Sakurai, Toshioki
    Iinuma, Tomohisa
    Sakurai, Daiju
    Hanazawa, Toyoyuki
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 162 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [35] DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY ON KETOTIFEN IN SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS
    MELILLO, G
    DAMATO, G
    COCCO, G
    DAGOSTINO, F
    CORBETTA, G
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1983, 34 (02): : 350 - 356
  • [36] Rupatadine for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: metanalysis of randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies
    Compalati, E.
    Rogkakou, A.
    Fulvio, B.
    Walter, Giorgio C.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 333 - 333
  • [37] Rupatadine oral solution in children with persistent allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Potter, Paul
    Maspero, Jorge F.
    Vermeulen, Jan
    Barkai, Laszlo
    Nemeth, Ildiko
    Baillieau, Rene A.
    Garde, Jesus M.
    Giralt, Josep
    Domenech, Alejandro
    Izquierdo, Inaki
    Nieto, Antonio
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [38] Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study
    Dakhale, Ganesh
    Tathod, Yogesh
    Patel, Seema
    Pimpalkhute, Sonali
    Raghute, Latesh
    Khamkar, Ajita
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACOTHERAPEUTICS, 2016, 7 (04) : 171 - 176
  • [39] Rhinophototherapy in persistent allergic rhinitis: randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study
    Bella, Z.
    Kiricsi, A.
    Racz, Viharosne Dosa E.
    Kadocsa, E.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 : 452 - 452
  • [40] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF OMEPRAZOLE 10 MG AND 30 MG DAILY FOR HEALING DUODENAL-ULCERS
    PRICHARD, PJ
    RUBINSTEIN, D
    JONES, DB
    DUDLEY, FJ
    SMALLWOOD, RA
    LOUIS, WJ
    YEOMANS, ND
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 290 (6468): : 601 - 603