Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Reproductive Performance

被引:4
|
作者
Hickmann, Felipe M. W. [1 ,2 ]
Braccini Neto, Jose [2 ]
Kramer, Luke M. [1 ]
Huang, Yijian [3 ]
Gray, Kent A. . [3 ]
Dekkers, Jack C. M. [1 ]
Sanglard, Leticia P. [1 ]
Serao, Nick V. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Anim Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Smithfield Premium Genet, Rose Hill, NC USA
关键词
disease outbreak; genomics; GWAS; PRRS; QTL; reproduction; SNP; swine; SYNDROME VIRUS-INFECTION; COMMERCIAL SOWS; PIGS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; OUTBREAK; TRAITS;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2021.707870
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is historically the most economically important swine disease worldwide that severely affects the reproductive performance of sows. However, little is still known about the genetic basis of reproductive performance in purebred herds during a PRRS outbreak through the comparison of maternal and terminal breeds. Thus, the objective of this work was to explore the host genetics of response to PRRS in purebred sows from two breeds. Reproductive data included 2546 Duroc and 2522 Landrace litters from 894 and 813 purebred sows, respectively, which had high-density genotype data available (29,799 single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs). The data were split into pre-PRRS, PRRS, and post-PRRS phases based on standardized farrow-year-week estimates. Heritability estimates for reproductive traits were low to moderate (<= 0.20) for Duroc and Landrace across PRRS phases. On the other hand, genetic correlations of reproductive traits between PRRS phases were overall moderate to high for both breeds. Several associations between MARC0034894, a candidate SNP for response to PRRS, with reproductive performance were identified (P-value < 0.05). Genomic analyses detected few QTL for reproductive performance across all phases, most explaining a small percentage of the additive genetic variance (<= 8.2%, averaging 2.1%), indicating that these traits are highly polygenic. None of the identified QTL within a breed and trait overlapped between PRRS phases. Overall, our results indicate that Duroc sows are phenotypically more resilient to PRRS than Landrace sows, with a similar return to PRRS-free performance between breeds for most reproductive traits. Genomic prediction results indicate that genomic selection for improved reproductive performance under a PRRS outbreak is possible, especially in Landrace sows, by training markers using data from PRRS-challenged sows. On the other hand, the high genetic correlations with reproductive traits between PRRS phases suggest that selection for improved reproductive performance in a clean environment could improve performance during PRRS, but with limited efficiency due to their low heritability estimates. Thus, we hypothesize that an indicator trait that could be indirectly selected to increase the response to selection for these traits would be desirable and would also improve the reproductive performance of sows during a PRRS outbreak.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
    Raef, TA
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2006, 14 (04): : 223 - 223
  • [22] PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME
    YESKE, P
    COMPENDIUM ON CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR THE PRACTICING VETERINARIAN, 1993, 15 (09): : 1307 - &
  • [23] γδ lymphocyte response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
    Olin, MR
    Batista, L
    Xiao, ZG
    Dee, SA
    Murtaugh, MP
    Pijoan, CC
    Molitor, TW
    VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 18 (03) : 490 - 499
  • [24] Pathogenesis of plaque variants of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in pregnant sows
    Park, BK
    Yoon, IJ
    Joo, HS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1996, 57 (03) : 320 - 323
  • [25] Shedding of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in mammary gland secretions of sows
    Wagstrom, EA
    Chang, CC
    Yoon, KJ
    Zimmerman, JJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2001, 62 (12) : 1876 - 1880
  • [26] Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Reverse Genetics and the Major Applications
    Chaudhari, Jayeshbhai
    Vu, Hiep L. X.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2020, 12 (11):
  • [27] Correlation of cell-mediated immunity against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus with protection against reproductive failure in sows during outbreaks of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in commercial herds
    Lowe, JF
    Husmann, R
    Firkins, LD
    Zuckermann, FA
    Goldberg, TL
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 226 (10): : 1707 - 1711
  • [28] Reproductive performance in pig farms seropositive to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (VPRRS)
    Edmundo Lucho-Cerga, Miguel
    Pujada Abad, Hilario Noberto
    Esteban Airahuacho-Bautista, Felix
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU, 2020, 31 (01):
  • [29] Evidence for a major QTL associated with host response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus challenge
    Boddicker, N.
    Waide, E. H.
    Rowland, R. R. R.
    Lunney, J. K.
    Garrick, D. J.
    Reecy, J. M.
    Dekkers, J. C. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 90 (06) : 1733 - 1746
  • [30] Genetic perspectives on host responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)
    Lewis, Craig R. G.
    Ait-Ali, Tahar
    Clapperton, Mary
    Archibald, Alan L.
    Bishop, Stephen C.
    VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 20 (03) : 343 - 357