Dynamic model reduction for two-stage anaerobic digestion processes

被引:15
|
作者
Duan, Zhaoyang [1 ]
Bournazou, Mariano Nicolas Cruz [2 ]
Kravaris, Costas [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Biotechnol, Dept Bioproc Engn, D-13355 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Bioreactors; Mathematical modeling; Nonlinear dynamics; Model reduction; Anaerobic digestion; WASTE-WATER; METHANE; STABILITY; CHEMOSTAT; SYSTEMS; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.110
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the development, analysis and reduction of a two-stage anaerobic digestion process model. A two-stage model based on a two-step mass-balance model is first developed. The model incorporates two stages as two similar CSTRs, with acidogenesis in the first stage and mainly methanogenesis in the second. Steady state optimization validates the benefits of two-stage operation compared to the traditional one-stage process. Using reaction invariants, the dynamics of the fast modes is neglected by projecting the overall system dynamics on the slow-motion invariant manifold, and the original 7-state model is reduced to a 5th order system. By neglecting the nearly unobservable modes, the model is further reduced to 3rd order. Simulation results show excellent accuracy of the reduced model compared to the detailed one. At the same time, they indicate the necessity of process control for stabilization of the system. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1116
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion of extruded lignocellulosic biomass
    Akobi, Chinaza
    Yeo, Hyeongu
    Hafez, Hisham
    Nakhla, George
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 : 548 - 559
  • [22] Two-stage, thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
    Roberts, R.
    Davies, W.J.
    Forster, C.F.
    Process Safety and Environmental Protection: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B, 1999, 77 (02): : 93 - 97
  • [23] Influence of pressures up to 50 bar on two-stage anaerobic digestion
    Merkle, Wolfgang
    Baer, Katharina
    Lindner, Jonas
    Zielonka, Simon
    Ortloff, Felix
    Graf, Frank
    Kolb, Thomas
    Jungbluth, Thomas
    Lemmer, Andreas
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 232 : 72 - 78
  • [24] Anaerobic digestion of citrus waste using two-stage membrane bioreactor
    Millati, Ria
    Lukitawesa
    Permanasari, Ervina Dwi
    Sari, Kartika Wulan
    Cahyanto, Muhammad Nur
    Niklasson, Claes
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    QUALITY IN RESEARCH: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATERIALS, METALLURGY, AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 316
  • [25] Simplified hydrolysis models for the optimal design of two-stage anaerobic digestion
    Vavilin, VA
    Rytov, SV
    Lokshina, LY
    Rintala, JA
    Lyberatos, G
    WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (17) : 4247 - 4251
  • [26] Biological methanation of injected hydrogen in a two-stage anaerobic digestion process
    Illi, Lukas
    Lecker, Bernhard
    Lemmer, Andreas
    Muller, Joachim
    Oechsner, Hans
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 333
  • [27] Two-stage, thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
    Roberts, R
    Davies, WJ
    Forster, CF
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1999, 77 (B2) : 93 - 97
  • [28] Methane production from napier grass by two-stage anaerobic digestion
    Sinbuathong, Nusara
    Sangsil, Yuwadee
    Leungprasert, Suchat
    Sawanon, Suriya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2016, 10 (04) : 423 - 436
  • [29] Integration of two-stage anaerobic digestion process with in situ biogas upgrading
    Yellezuome, Dominic
    Zhu, Xianpu
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Xuwei
    Liu, Ronghou
    Wang, Zengzhen
    Li, Yingkai
    Sun, Chen
    Abd-Alla, Mohamed Hemida
    Rasmey, Abdel-Hamied M.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 369
  • [30] Critical considerations in two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste - A review
    Srisowmeya, G.
    Chakravarthy, M.
    Devi, G. Nandhini
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 119