COMPOST HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS: GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL IMPACT ESTIMATION AND COMPARISON THROUGH A LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT APPROACH

被引:3
|
作者
Malesani, Rachele [1 ]
Schievano, Andrea [2 ]
Di Maria, Francesco [3 ]
Sisani, Federico [3 ]
Pivato, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, DICEA, Via Marzolo 9, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Perugia, Dept Engn, LAR, Via G Duranti 93, I-06125 Perugia, Italy
来源
DETRITUS | 2022年 / 19卷
关键词
Aerobic digestion; Biomass valorisation; Compost Heat Recovery Systems; Life Cycle Assessment; Renewable energy; Waste to energy; AEROBIC BIOCONVERSION;
D O I
10.31025/2611-4135/2022.15196
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Compost Heat Recovery Systems (CHRS) represent an innovative technology to provide domestic decentralized thermal energy, recovering the heat naturally produced during the aerobic biodegradation of waste biomass, coming from gardening/farming/forestry activities. CHRSs represent an alternative to centralized grid-connected power systems and are usually installed (combined with most traditional systems) to power underfloor heating systems (UHS) or domestic hot water systems (DHWS), lowering impacts and costs of thermal energy production. In this study, the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of CHRSs (measured as kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh) was investigated using life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, considering the whole life cycle of an average plant. CHRSs showed a negative Net value of GWP impact, equal to -0.268 kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh, as full balance of positive (0.062 kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh) and negative (-0.329 kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh) emissions. Negative emissions are related to avoided primary materials, replacement of natural gas used as traditional thermal energy production and replacement of mineral fertilizers. Considering only the positive emissions (0.062 kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh), CHRSs emerged to be in line with Solar Hot-Water Systems (0.061 kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh mean value) and slightly higher than Geothermal Systems (0.019 kg(CO2)(-eq)/kWh mean value). Along with GWP impact, other midpoint and endpoint impact indicators were assessed and all showed a negative Net value: Particulate Matter PM (-2.36E-5 kg(PM2)(.5-eq)/kWh), Fresh Water eutrophication FWE (-6.78E-06 kg(P-eq)/kWh), Fresh Water ecotoxicity FWec (-2.10E-01 CTUe/kWh), Human Toxicity cancer effect HTc (-5.68E-09 CTUh/kWh), Human Toxicity non-cancer effect HTnc (-3.51E-09 CTUh/kWh) and Human Health HH (-5.22E-08 DALY/kWh). These results demonstrate that CHRS is extremely convenient considering both environmental and human health consequences.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-scale assessment of global warming mitigation potential of anaerobic digestion for food waste management in the United States: A comparison of Life Cycle Assessment approaches
    Karaiskakis, Alexandros N.
    Hernandez, Borja
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 203
  • [32] Modeling cumulative effects in life cycle assessment: The case of fertilizer in wheat production contributing to the global warming potential
    Laratte, Bertrand
    Guillaume, Bertrand
    Kim, Junbeum
    Birregah, Babiga
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 481 : 588 - 595
  • [33] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT OF 2007: ETHANOL - GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Hsu, David D.
    Inman, Daniel
    Aden, Andy
    Mann, Margaret K.
    ES2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 1, 2009, : 857 - 861
  • [34] Understanding the global warming potential of circular design strategies: Life cycle assessment of a design-for-disassembly building
    Roberts, Matthew
    Allen, Stephen
    Clarke, Joanna
    Searle, Justin
    Coley, David
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 37 : 331 - 343
  • [35] Quantifying the global warming potential of low carbon concrete mixes: Comparison of existing life cycle analysis tools
    Witte, Andrew
    Garg, Nishant
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2024, 20
  • [36] Fuzzy approach to life cycle impact assessment -: An application for biowaste management systems
    Guereca, Leonor Patricia
    Agell, Nuria
    Gasso, Santiago
    Maria Baldasano, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (07): : 488 - 496
  • [37] A Comparison of the Environmental Impact of Different Heating Systems Using the Life Cycle Approach
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (03) : 214 - 228
  • [38] Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae in Thailand: Energy Efficiency and Global Warming Impact Reduction
    Wibul, Pharawee
    Malakul, Pomthong
    Pavasant, Prasert
    Kangvansaichol, Kunn
    Papong, Seksan
    PRES 2012: 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2012, 29 : 1183 - 1188
  • [39] Municipal solid waste conversion to transportation fuels: a life-cycle estimation of global warming potential and energy consumption
    Pressley, Phillip N.
    Aziz, Tarek N.
    DeCarolis, Joseph F.
    Barlaz, Morton A.
    He, Feng
    Li, Fanxing
    Damgaard, Anders
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 70 : 145 - 153
  • [40] Assessment of embodied energy and global warming potential of building construction using life cycle analysis approach: Case studies of residential buildings in Iskandar Malaysia
    Wen, Thong Jia
    Siong, Ho Chin
    Noor, Z. Z.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 93 : 295 - 302