Efficacy of the Additional Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:62
|
作者
Chen, Yu-Pei [1 ]
Guo, Rui [1 ]
Liu, Na [1 ]
Liu, Xu [1 ]
Mao, Yan-Ping [1 ]
Tang, Ling-Long [1 ]
Zhou, Guan-Qun [1 ]
Lin, Ai-Hua [2 ]
Sun, Ying [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat & Epidemiol, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2015年 / 6卷 / 09期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy; meta-analysis; nasopharyngeal; neoplasms; radiotherapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; PHASE-II TRIAL; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN-RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PUBLISHED LITERATURE; WEEKLY OXALIPLATIN; SURVIVAL; CANCER; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.7150/jca.11814
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Due to the lack of studies, it remains unclear whether the additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to CCRT alone for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The main objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of NACT+CCRT as compared with CCRT alone. Methods: We comprehensively searched databases and extracted data from randomized controlled trials involving NPC patients who received NACT+CCRT, CCRT, NACT+radiotherapy (RT), or RT. Overall survival (OS) with hazard ratio (HR), and locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and distant metastasis rate (DMR) with relative risks (RRs), were concerned. Results: Nine trials involving 1988 patients were analyzed. In the network meta-analysis, there was significant benefit of NACT+CCRT over CCRT for DMR (RR=0.54, 95% credible interval [CrI]=0.27-0.94). However, NACT+CCRT had a tendency to worsen locoregional control significantly as compared with CCRT (RR = 1.71, 95% CrI = 0.94-2.84), and no significant improvement in OS was found (HR = 0.73, 95% CrI=0.40-1.23). Conclusions: NACT+CCRT is associated with reduced distant failure as compared with CCRT alone, and whether the additional NACT can improve survival for locoregionally advanced NPC should be further explored. Optimizing regimens and identifying patients at high risk of metastasis may enhance the efficacy of NACT+CCRT.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 892
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in intermediate and locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Zhang, Wendong
    Dou, Huiqin
    Lam, Chileong
    Liu, Jixi
    Zhou, Jianfeng
    Liu, Yunsheng
    Wang, Xiuwen
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) : 1729 - 1736
  • [32] Tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in local advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Luo, Haiqing
    He, Jiaqi
    Yi, Guihua
    Tang, Haifeng
    Yang, Donghong
    Li, Haiwen
    Yu, Ying
    Chen, Zihong
    Zhan, Dechao
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [33] Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy on Nutritional Status in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
    Miao, J.
    Hu, C.
    Lin, S.
    Chen, X.
    Chen, Y.
    Zhong, Y.
    Jin, F.
    Lin, Q.
    Hu, X.
    Zhang, N.
    Wang, R.
    Wang, L.
    Wang, C.
    Zhu, M.
    Wu, H.
    Di, M.
    Huang, Y.
    Xie, C.
    Zhao, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E334 - E334
  • [34] Which treatment is better than concurrent chemoradiotherapy about survival for stage III or IV locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? An updated Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lucheng Fang
    Licai Shi
    Wen Wang
    Tingting Hu
    Xingwang Rao
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 3633 - 3642
  • [35] Which treatment is better than concurrent chemoradiotherapy about survival for stage III or IV locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? An updated Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fang, Lucheng
    Shi, Licai
    Wang, Wen
    Hu, Tingting
    Rao, Xingwang
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (10) : 3633 - 3642
  • [36] Comparison of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Guoqiang, X.
    Wei, X.
    Qiaoli, W.
    Ruixue, C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S1353 - S1353
  • [37] Comparison of TPF and PF induction chemotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Haiwen
    Wu, Qibiao
    Luo, Haiqing
    Wu, Jiayuan
    Su, Wenmei
    Yu, Lili
    MEDICINE, 2025, 104 (03)
  • [38] Less is more: role of additional chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer management
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 37 (02): : 67 - 72
  • [39] Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy/maintenance chemotherapy after induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Experiences of two centers
    Tao, Hao-Yun
    He, Fang
    Shi, Qi-Yun
    Liu, Ran
    Wang, Zhi-Long
    Du, Kun-Peng
    Li, Jian-Feng
    Liu, Hui
    Lu, Zhi-Qiang
    Zhang, Jing-Jing
    Bai, Yu-Hai
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06): : 6811 - 6824
  • [40] The evaluation of adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Min Tang
    Zhongxiong Jia
    Ju Zhang
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 1545 - 1558