Fee-for-service payment is not the (main) problem

被引:8
|
作者
Dowd, Bryan E. [1 ]
Laugesen, Miriam J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY USA
关键词
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; fee-for-service; fees; health care expenditure; Medicare; payment reform; physicians; reimbursement; PRICES; ASSOCIATION; SCHEDULE; PROVIDER; OVERUSE; UPDATE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.13316
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To understand the effect of physician payment incentives on the allocation of health care resources. Data Sources/Study Setting Review and analysis of the literature on physician payment incentives. Study Design Analysis of current physician payment incentives and several ways to modify those incentives to encourage increased efficiency. Principal Findings Fee-for-service payments can be incorporated into systems that encourage efficient pricing - prices that are close to the provider's marginal cost - by giving consumers information on provider-specific prices and a strong incentive to choose lower cost providers. However, efficient pricing of services ultimately will need to be supplemented by incentives for efficient production of health and functional status. Conclusions The problem with current FFS payment is not paying a fee for each service, per se, but the way in which the fees are determined.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 495
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Obamacare and Fee-for-Service
    Silva, Ezequiel, III
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (07) : 656 - 656
  • [22] The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform: Recalibrating Fee-for-Service and Transitioning to Fixed Payment Models
    Siddiqui, Mona
    Joy, Scott
    Elwell, David
    Anderson, Gerard F.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (05) : 700 - 702
  • [23] The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform: Recalibrating Fee-for-Service and Transitioning to Fixed Payment Models
    Mona Siddiqui
    Scott Joy
    David Elwell
    Gerard F. Anderson
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2014, 29 : 700 - 702
  • [24] Fee-for-service folly
    Harris-Shapiro, J
    HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS, 1998, 72 (18): : 8 - 8
  • [25] Choosing fee-for-service
    Draper, L
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2002, 48 : 1612 - 1612
  • [26] ATTACKING FEE-FOR-SERVICE
    WADE, JCL
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1988, 138 (07) : 593 - 593
  • [27] Secondary Interpretation of CT Examinations: Frequency and Payment in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Population
    Lu, Michael T.
    Hallett, Travis R.
    Hemingway, Jennifer
    Hughes, Danny R.
    Hoffmann, Udo
    Duszak, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (09) : 1096 - 1101
  • [28] Relation of Payment Method to Completion of a Fee-for-service Comprehensive Weight Loss Program
    Brown, Joshua D.
    Hendrix, Emily
    O'Neil, Patrick M.
    OBESITY, 2009, 17 : S121 - S121
  • [29] HOME HEALTH-CARE OUTCOMES UNDER CAPITATED AND FEE-FOR-SERVICE PAYMENT
    SHAUGHNESSY, PW
    SCHLENKER, RE
    HITTLE, DF
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 1994, 16 (01): : 187 - 222
  • [30] Quality of Diabetes Care in Blended Fee-for-Service and Blended Capitation Payment Systems
    Bamimore, Mary Aderayo
    Devlin, Rose Anne
    Zaric, Gregory S.
    Garg, Amit X.
    Sarma, Sisira
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2021, 45 (03) : 261 - +