Fee-for-service payment is not the (main) problem

被引:8
|
作者
Dowd, Bryan E. [1 ]
Laugesen, Miriam J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY USA
关键词
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; fee-for-service; fees; health care expenditure; Medicare; payment reform; physicians; reimbursement; PRICES; ASSOCIATION; SCHEDULE; PROVIDER; OVERUSE; UPDATE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6773.13316
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To understand the effect of physician payment incentives on the allocation of health care resources. Data Sources/Study Setting Review and analysis of the literature on physician payment incentives. Study Design Analysis of current physician payment incentives and several ways to modify those incentives to encourage increased efficiency. Principal Findings Fee-for-service payments can be incorporated into systems that encourage efficient pricing - prices that are close to the provider's marginal cost - by giving consumers information on provider-specific prices and a strong incentive to choose lower cost providers. However, efficient pricing of services ultimately will need to be supplemented by incentives for efficient production of health and functional status. Conclusions The problem with current FFS payment is not paying a fee for each service, per se, but the way in which the fees are determined.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 495
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COUNTERTRANSFERENCE AND FEE-FOR-SERVICE PAYMENT
    BELSER, E
    SOCIAL CASEWORK-JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL WORK, 1979, 60 (08): : 500 - 500
  • [2] Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment
    Schroeder, Steven A.
    Frist, William
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (21): : 2029 - 2032
  • [3] PHYSICIAN RESPONSES TO FEE-FOR-SERVICE AND CAPITATION PAYMENT
    STEARNS, SC
    WOLFE, BL
    KINDIG, DA
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 1992, 29 (04) : 416 - 425
  • [4] FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND THE FUTURE OF FEE-FOR-SERVICE PAYMENT PLANS
    DAVIDSON, RC
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1986, 23 (03): : 275 - 278
  • [5] Outlook for Alternative Payment Models in Fee-for-Service Medicare
    Clough, Jeffrey D.
    Richman, Barak D.
    Glickman, Seth W.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (04): : 341 - 342
  • [6] Payment Reduction and Medicare Private Fee-for-Service Plans
    Frakt, Austin B.
    Pizer, Steven D.
    Feldman, Roger
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 2009, 30 (03): : 15 - 24
  • [7] Bundled Payment vs. Fee-for-Service: Impact of Payment Scheme on Performance
    Adida, Elodie
    Mamani, Hamed
    Nassiri, Shima
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (05) : 1606 - 1624
  • [8] The End of Fee-for-Service Medicine? Proposals for Payment Reform in Massachusetts
    Steinbrook, Robert
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (11): : 1036 - 1038
  • [9] Fee-for-service payment - an evil practice that must be stamped out?
    Ikegami, Naoki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 4 (02) : 57 - 59
  • [10] In Defense of Regulated Fee-for-Service Payment: A Response to Recent Commentaries
    Ikegami, Naoki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT-IJHPM, 2015, 4 (09): : 635 - 636