The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame - a deterministic assessment

被引:259
|
作者
Dolsek, Matjaz [1 ]
Fajfar, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civ & Geodet Engn, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
seismic assessment; reinforced concrete frame; masonry infill; infilled RC frame; simplified nonlinear analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame has been studied using the N2 method. The method is based on pushover analysis and the inelastic spectrum approach. It was recently extended in order to make it applicable to infilled reinforced concrete frames. In the paper the method is summarized and applied to the deterministic seismic assessment of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame with masonry infills, with openings and without them. A comparison has been made with the behaviour of the bare frame. The most common analytical modelling technique, which employs compressive diagonal struts for modelling of the masonry infill, and one-component lumped plasticity elements for modelling the flexural behaviour of the beams and columns, was applied. The results of the analyses indicate that the infills can completely change the distribution of damage throughout the structure. The infills can have a beneficial effect on the structural response, provided that they are placed regularly throughout the structure, and that they do not cause shear failures of columns. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1991 / 2001
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of openings in URM infills on the seismic resilience of a reinforced concrete building
    Prasanth, S.
    Ghosh, Goutam
    Gupta, Praveen Kumar
    Kumar, Virendra
    Paramasivam, Prabhu
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [32] Influence of masonry infills on blast response of earthquake-resistant reinforced concrete buildings
    Baddipalli, Shivalinga
    Kulariya, Mahipal
    Saha, Sandip Kumar
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 50 : 908 - 924
  • [33] Dynamic Response of Masonry Walls Connected with a Reinforced Concrete Frame
    Stavroulaki, Maria E.
    Pateraki, Katerina
    RECENT ADVANCES IN CONTACT MECHANICS, 2013, 56 : 257 - 273
  • [34] In-Plane Seismic Response of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Block Masonry-Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame Building
    Zade, Nikhil P.
    Bhosale, Avadhoot
    Sarkar, Pradip
    Davis, Robin
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2022, 119 (02) : 45 - 60
  • [35] Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Masonry Infills Based on Material Strain Limit Approach
    Shendkar, Mangeshkumar R.
    Kontoni, Denise-Penelope N.
    Mandal, Sasankasekhar
    Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan
    Tavasoli, Omid
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2021, 2021
  • [36] On the seismic behavior of a reinforced concrete building with masonry infills collapsed during the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake
    Palermo, Michele
    Hernandez, Ricardo Rafael
    Mazzoni, Silvia
    Trombetti, Tomaso
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 6 (01) : 45 - 69
  • [37] The Seismic Behaviour Of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures With Infill Masonry In The Bucharest Area
    Bolea, Ovidiu
    EENVIRO-YRC 2015 - BUCHAREST, 2016, 85 : 60 - 76
  • [38] Experimental and analytical assessment of the influence of masonry fa?ade infills on seismic behavior of RC frame buildings
    Pallares, Francisco J.
    Davia, Antonio
    Hassan, Wael M.
    Pallares, Luis
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 235
  • [39] Effect of masonry infill wall with opening on reinforced concrete frame due to seismic loading: parametric study
    Akid, Abu Sayed Mohammad
    Rashid, Muhammad Harunur
    Sobuz, Md Habibur Rahman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 11 (01) : 84 - 105
  • [40] RAPID ASSESSMENT OF PEAK STOREY DRIFT DEMANDS ON REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME BUILDINGS
    Sullivan, Timothy J.
    BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 52 (03): : 109 - 118